Meaning: This quote by Hugo Gernsback touches on the evolution of descriptive elements in literature, specifically in the context of the transition from the traditional novelist to the modern Scientific Detective writer. Gernsback was a Luxembourgish-American inventor, writer, editor, and magazine publisher who is often referred to as the "Father of Science Fiction." He founded several science fiction magazines and played a key role in popularizing the genre.

In this quote, Gernsback draws a parallel between the descriptive techniques used by old novelists and those employed by modern Scientific Detective writers. He likens the old novelist's detailed descriptions of clouds and sunsets to the modern Scientific Detective writer's descriptions of scientific apparatus and methods. This comparison sheds light on the changing nature of literary description and the influence of scientific advancements on storytelling.

To fully understand the significance of Gernsback's quote, it's important to explore the context in which it was made. Gernsback was an influential figure in the early 20th century, a time of rapid technological and scientific progress. This era saw the emergence of new fields of study, groundbreaking inventions, and a growing fascination with science and its potential to shape the future. Gernsback's quote reflects this cultural backdrop and the ways in which it impacted literary expression.

The reference to the "old novelist" evokes a sense of nostalgia for traditional literary techniques, which often relied on vivid, poetic descriptions of natural phenomena such as clouds and sunsets. These descriptions served to set the mood, evoke emotions, and create a sensory experience for the reader. They were an integral part of storytelling, allowing authors to immerse their audience in the world of their narrative.

In contrast, Gernsback introduces the "modern Scientific Detective writer," a figure whose descriptive focus has shifted towards scientific apparatus and methods. This reflects a shift in cultural and intellectual priorities, as the advancements of science and technology began to capture the public imagination. The Scientific Detective genre emerged as a reflection of society's growing interest in using scientific principles to solve mysteries and crimes.

By likening the description of scientific apparatus and methods to the traditional descriptions of natural elements, Gernsback highlights the evolving role of science in shaping the literary landscape. The Scientific Detective writer's attention to scientific detail mirrors the old novelist's focus on natural beauty, illustrating a shift in what is considered evocative and captivating in literature.

Gernsback's quote also speaks to the concept of "showing, not telling" in storytelling. Just as the old novelist showed the beauty of nature through descriptive language, the modern Scientific Detective writer shows the intricacies of scientific investigation through detailed explanations of apparatus and methods. This approach allows readers to immerse themselves in the world of science and investigation, creating a sense of authenticity and plausibility in the narrative.

Furthermore, Gernsback's quote sheds light on the interdisciplinary nature of literature and science. It underscores the idea that literature is not confined to the realm of imagination and emotion but can also be a vehicle for exploring and showcasing scientific knowledge. The blending of literary and scientific elements in the work of the Scientific Detective writer reflects a broader trend of cross-disciplinary exploration and collaboration.

In conclusion, Hugo Gernsback's quote encapsulates the evolving nature of literary description in response to societal and cultural changes. It underscores the impact of scientific advancements on storytelling and highlights the shifting focus of descriptive elements in literature. By drawing parallels between the old novelist's portrayal of natural beauty and the modern Scientific Detective writer's depiction of scientific detail, Gernsback invites us to consider the dynamic relationship between literature and science.