Meaning: Walter Gilbert, an American biochemist, molecular biologist, and Nobel laureate, made this statement, which reflects the complex nature of the scientific community and its inherent strengths and weaknesses. Gilbert's quote underscores the dichotomy within the scientific community, where skepticism and critical thinking are valued, yet the community can also be prone to entrenched establishment views that limit the diversity of scientific approaches and perspectives.

The first part of Gilbert's quote, "Scientists tend to be skeptical," highlights a fundamental characteristic of the scientific mindset. Skepticism is a cornerstone of scientific inquiry, serving as a safeguard against accepting ideas or claims without sufficient evidence or rigorous examination. Scientists are trained to question, challenge, and critically evaluate hypotheses, theories, and experimental results. This skepticism fosters a healthy environment for intellectual rigor and the pursuit of knowledge based on empirical evidence.

However, Gilbert also points out a weakness within the scientific community, noting that it "tends to move into preformed establishment modes that say this is the only way of doing science, the only valid view." This observation alludes to the potential for dogma and rigidity to emerge within scientific disciplines, leading to the establishment of dominant paradigms or orthodoxies that may stifle innovation and limit the exploration of alternative perspectives.

One interpretation of Gilbert's statement is that the scientific community, despite its commitment to skepticism and evidence-based inquiry, can become entrenched in certain beliefs or methodologies, creating barriers to the acceptance of new ideas or unconventional approaches. This tendency toward conformity and resistance to change may impede scientific progress and hinder the exploration of novel concepts, methodologies, or paradigms that could potentially lead to breakthroughs in understanding the natural world.

Moreover, Gilbert's assertion suggests that the "preformed establishment modes" within the scientific community may lead to the marginalization of diverse viewpoints and approaches. This phenomenon can result in exclusionary practices that limit the participation and recognition of researchers who do not adhere to the prevailing norms or frameworks. Such exclusion can have detrimental effects on the inclusivity, creativity, and robustness of scientific discourse and discovery.

In a broader context, Gilbert's quote underscores the ongoing tension between tradition and innovation in science. While the scientific method encourages skepticism and empirical testing, the human tendency to coalesce around established paradigms and orthodoxies can act as a counterforce to the open-minded exploration of new ideas and methodologies. Recognizing and addressing this tension is crucial for fostering a scientific community that is dynamic, inclusive, and receptive to diverse perspectives and approaches.

In conclusion, Walter Gilbert's quote encapsulates the dual nature of the scientific community, highlighting its inherent skepticism as well as its susceptibility to entrenched establishment modes. By acknowledging these complexities, the scientific community can strive to cultivate an environment that embraces critical inquiry, welcomes diverse perspectives, and remains open to the evolution of scientific thought and practice.