Meaning: The quote "The car is a character in the piece - I've never liked the car, I submitted to its objectionable popularity" by Paul Glaser is a thought-provoking statement that delves into the complex relationship between individuals and their automobiles. This quote suggests that the car is not just a mode of transportation, but a significant element that influences and is influenced by the owner's identity and values. Paul Glaser, the author of the quote, seems to express a sense of resignation and frustration with the pervasive influence of the car in modern society.

The notion that the car is a character in the piece implies that it plays a role beyond its practical function. Just as characters in a story or play have distinct personalities and impact the narrative, the car, in this context, is portrayed as having a presence and influence that goes beyond its mechanical attributes. This perspective aligns with the idea that cars hold symbolic and cultural significance, often representing status, freedom, and personal identity.

Glaser's admission that he has never liked the car but has submitted to its objectionable popularity reflects a common sentiment among individuals who may feel conflicted about their reliance on automobiles. Despite any personal reservations or criticisms, the widespread cultural and societal norms surrounding car ownership and usage can lead individuals to conform to its perceived appeal and necessity. This internal struggle between personal preference and external pressures speaks to the complex emotions and societal expectations associated with car ownership.

The quote also raises questions about the nature of popularity and its impact on individual choices. The term "objectionable popularity" suggests that the widespread embrace of cars may be viewed as problematic or undesirable from a critical standpoint. This could refer to issues such as environmental concerns, urban congestion, or the dominance of car culture over alternative modes of transportation. Glaser's use of the word "objectionable" indicates a sense of disapproval or resistance to the prevailing attitudes and behaviors related to car ownership.

In a broader context, the quote can be seen as a commentary on the pervasive influence of consumerism and the challenges of navigating personal values within a society driven by materialism and commercial interests. Cars are often marketed as symbols of success, adventure, and modernity, which can create a powerful allure that is difficult to resist or reject, even if one harbors reservations about their impact on the environment or social dynamics.

From a psychological perspective, the quote also touches upon the concept of cognitive dissonance, wherein individuals experience discomfort when their beliefs or attitudes are in conflict with their actions. This internal tension may arise when individuals recognize the negative aspects of car culture while simultaneously participating in and benefiting from it.

In conclusion, Paul Glaser's quote encapsulates the nuanced relationship between individuals and their cars, highlighting the multifaceted role that automobiles play in shaping personal identity, societal norms, and cultural values. It invites contemplation on the complexities of consumer behavior, societal influences, and the interplay between personal preferences and external pressures in the context of car ownership and popular culture.