Meaning: The quote by Remy Gourmont, a French novelist and essayist, sheds light on the impact of industrialization and technological advancement on society, particularly on artisans, labor, and capital. Gourmont's assertion that industry has operated against the artisan in favor of the idler, and in favor of capital against labor, reflects his concerns about the social and economic consequences of industrialization. In this analysis, I will explore the context of the quote and offer insights into the implications of Gourmont's perspective.

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the industrial revolution brought about significant changes in the way goods were produced, leading to the rise of factories and mass production. This shift from artisanal and craft-based production to industrial manufacturing had a profound impact on traditional artisans and skilled workers. Gourmont's reference to industry operating against the artisan suggests that the new industrial processes marginalized and displaced these craftsmen, whose livelihoods and skills were devalued in the face of mass production.

Furthermore, Gourmont's assertion that industry favored the idler over labor speaks to the unequal distribution of benefits and rewards in the industrial era. The idler may refer to those who profited from industrial capitalism without actively contributing to the labor force, such as wealthy industrialists or investors. Gourmont's critique implies that the fruits of industrialization were not equitably shared, exacerbating social and economic disparities.

The quote also touches on the relationship between technological innovation and its impact on humanity. Gourmont's provocative claim that "any mechanical invention whatsoever has been more harmful to humanity than a century of war" underscores his skepticism about the benefits of technological progress. This perspective challenges the commonly held belief in the inherent progressiveness of technology and its positive impact on society. Gourmont's statement invites reflection on the unintended consequences and ethical dimensions of technological advancement.

In examining Gourmont's quote, it is important to consider the broader historical and social context in which it was made. The late 19th and early 20th centuries witnessed rapid industrialization, urbanization, and the emergence of new social and economic structures. These transformations brought about both opportunities and challenges, as traditional ways of life were disrupted, and new power dynamics emerged.

From a labor perspective, the rise of industrial capitalism and the factory system led to the exploitation of workers, as long hours, low wages, and unsafe working conditions became prevalent. Gourmont's critique of industry in favor of capital against labor aligns with the labor movements and social reforms that sought to address these inequities and improve the rights of workers.

Moreover, Gourmont's view on the harmful impact of mechanical inventions raises important questions about the ethical responsibilities of technological development. While technological innovation has undoubtedly brought about advancements in medicine, communication, and quality of life, it has also been associated with environmental degradation, displacement of workers, and the erosion of traditional skills and knowledge.

In contemporary times, Gourmont's critique remains relevant as debates continue about the ethical implications of automation, artificial intelligence, and the gig economy. The tension between technological progress and its impact on labor, inequality, and human well-being persists, prompting ongoing discussions about the need for responsible innovation and inclusive economic policies.

In conclusion, Remy Gourmont's quote offers a thought-provoking commentary on the consequences of industrialization, the unequal distribution of benefits, and the broader implications of technological advancement. By examining Gourmont's perspective in the context of historical and contemporary challenges, we can gain valuable insights into the complex interplay between industry, labor, and technology in shaping society.