Meaning:
This quote by Juan Goytisolo, a Spanish poet and novelist, reflects on the relationship between writers and society, particularly in times when religious or political faith or hope are dominant. Goytisolo suggests that during such periods, writers align themselves with the prevailing sentiments of society and serve as a conduit for expressing its collective feelings, beliefs, and hopes.
When examining this quote, it's important to consider the context in which Goytisolo was writing. He lived through a period of significant political and social upheaval in Spain, including the Spanish Civil War and the subsequent Francoist dictatorship. These experiences likely influenced his perspective on the role of writers in relation to the prevailing ideologies and beliefs of society.
Goytisolo's assertion that writers function "totally in unison with society" during times of predominant religious or political faith or hope raises interesting questions about the role of literature and the responsibilities of writers. It suggests that writers, consciously or unconsciously, become aligned with the dominant ideologies and aspirations of their society, reflecting and reinforcing its collective consciousness.
Furthermore, the idea that writers express society's feelings, beliefs, and hopes "in perfect harmony" implies a harmonious relationship between the writer and the society they are part of. This raises questions about the potential for dissent and critique within literature, particularly during periods of ideological dominance. Goytisolo's assertion may be seen as both a recognition of the power of literature to reflect societal values and a challenge to writers to critically engage with and potentially subvert dominant ideologies.
One could argue that Goytisolo's perspective reflects a belief in the social and political relevance of literature. During times of societal upheaval or ideological dominance, literature can serve as a mirror, reflecting the prevailing beliefs and hopes of a society. This can provide a valuable insight into the collective consciousness of a particular historical moment.
On the other hand, Goytisolo's assertion may also be seen as a call for writers to critically engage with the dominant ideologies of their time. Rather than simply aligning themselves with prevailing beliefs, writers have the potential to challenge and subvert dominant narratives, offering alternative perspectives and critiquing the status quo.
In conclusion, Juan Goytisolo's quote offers an intriguing perspective on the relationship between writers and society during times of religious or political faith or hope. It raises important questions about the role of literature in reflecting and potentially challenging dominant ideologies, as well as the responsibilities of writers in relation to the prevailing values and aspirations of their society. Whether seen as a call for alignment or as a challenge to the status quo, Goytisolo's words invite us to consider the complex and dynamic relationship between literature and society.