Meaning: This quote by Justin Guarini, a musician and actor, reflects on the critical reception of a film and the notion that it was designed for a specific audience – in this case, children. The quote suggests that despite the negative reviews from critics, the film should be evaluated within the context of its intended audience and purpose.

When Guarini mentions that the film was "designed for kids," he is emphasizing that the target audience for the film was children. This implies that the film's content, themes, and overall presentation were tailored to appeal to a younger demographic. In this context, the success or failure of the film should be measured, at least in part, by its ability to engage and entertain its intended audience.

The phrase "the critics slashed it before it even started" indicates that the film faced harsh criticism even before it had the opportunity to prove itself to its target audience. This reflects a common phenomenon in the entertainment industry where a work, especially one aimed at children, may be dismissed or negatively evaluated by critics who are not part of the intended demographic. Critics, who often approach films from an adult perspective, may overlook the specific appeal and value of a children's film.

The final part of the quote, "that is just the way the cookie crumbles," suggests a sense of resignation or acceptance of the situation. Guarini seems to acknowledge that the film's fate, in the eyes of the critics, is beyond his control or the control of those involved in its creation. The expression "the way the cookie crumbles" implies that sometimes things simply unfold in an unfavorable manner, and individuals must accept the outcome, whether it is fair or not.

This quote raises important questions about the role of critics in evaluating media, especially when it is created for specific audiences. While critical analysis plays a valuable role in assessing the artistic and technical merits of a film, it is essential to consider the intended audience and purpose of the work. A children's film, for example, may prioritize elements such as humor, imagination, and moral lessons that resonate with young viewers, even if those aspects are not as appealing to adult critics.

In the context of children's media, it is crucial to recognize that the impact and success of a film should be measured by its ability to engage and entertain its target audience, rather than solely by the standards of adult critics. Moreover, the quote invites reflection on the potential disconnect between critical evaluation and the actual reception and enjoyment of the film by its intended viewers.

Guarini's perspective serves as a reminder that different forms of media, including films, are often created with specific audiences in mind. While critical assessments are valuable, they should be complemented by an understanding of the intended audience and the unique criteria by which a work aimed at children should be evaluated.

In conclusion, Justin Guarini's quote underscores the importance of considering the target audience and purpose of a film when evaluating its success and impact. It prompts a critical examination of the relationship between critical reception and the actual intended reception of children's media. Ultimately, it encourages a more nuanced and inclusive approach to assessing the value and merit of works created for specific audiences.