Meaning: Jurgen Habermas, a prominent German philosopher and sociologist, made the above statement in the context of the global political landscape in the aftermath of the intervention in Afghanistan. This quote reflects a crucial observation about the changing dynamics of international political discussions and the implications of the intervention on the global stage.

Habermas' reference to "intervention in Afghanistan" alludes to the military intervention led by the United States and its allies following the 9/11 attacks in 2001. This event marked a significant turning point in international relations, as it led to a heightened focus on the Middle East and Central Asia, with profound implications for global politics.

The phrase "we suddenly began to notice when, in political discussions, we found ourselves only among Europeans or Israelis" highlights a shift in the composition of political dialogues. Habermas suggests that the intervention in Afghanistan caused a reconfiguration of alliances and allegiances, leading to a noticeable absence of other global voices in these discussions. This absence may indicate a marginalization of certain perspectives or a restructuring of geopolitical relationships in the wake of the intervention.

Habermas' use of the term "Europeans or Israelis" is significant in this context. It points to the dominance of Western, particularly European, and Israeli voices in shaping post-intervention political discourse. This dominance may reflect the consolidation of power and influence among these actors, potentially sidelining other regions and nations in the geopolitical arena.

The quote underscores the interconnectedness of global politics and the profound impact of specific events, such as the intervention in Afghanistan, on the composition and dynamics of political discussions. It suggests that the intervention triggered a discernible shift in the participation and representation of various actors in these discussions, signaling a reconfiguration of power dynamics and alliances on the international stage.

Habermas' observation invites critical reflection on the implications of such shifts for global governance, diplomatic relations, and the representation of diverse perspectives in international decision-making processes. It raises questions about the inclusivity, equity, and legitimacy of political discussions and decisions in the aftermath of significant geopolitical events.

Moreover, the quote resonates with broader debates about the nature of power, influence, and representation in international relations. It prompts consideration of how certain geopolitical developments can reshape the distribution of voices and agency in global politics, potentially amplifying some while marginalizing others.

In conclusion, Jurgen Habermas' quote encapsulates a thought-provoking insight into the repercussions of the intervention in Afghanistan on the composition of political discussions. It serves as a reminder of the fluid and evolving nature of international relations, highlighting the need to critically examine the changing dynamics of global political discourse and the implications for diverse actors on the world stage.