Meaning: Marilyn Hacker's quote raises an important question about the relationship between American literary culture and the role of universities in shaping it. The quote reflects on the prevalence of American poets who support themselves by teaching creative writing in academic institutions, including Hacker herself. This observation provokes a deeper inquiry into the dynamics of literary production, the economic realities of being a poet, and the influence of academia on literary culture.

The quote suggests that there is a notable trend of American poets turning to teaching creative writing in universities as a means of earning a living. This raises questions about the economic viability of poetry as a profession and the factors that have led to this situation. It also highlights the significant role that universities play in supporting and sustaining the practice of poetry in the United States.

One possible interpretation of Hacker's quote is that the reliance of American poets on university teaching positions reflects a broader cultural and economic reality. The quote may be seen as a reflection of the challenges that poets face in finding sustainable sources of income outside of academia. This phenomenon could be attributed to the limited commercial market for poetry and the relative lack of financial support for poets compared to other literary forms.

Furthermore, the quote can be seen as a commentary on the institutionalization of creative writing within the academic setting. The fact that so many poets are employed as creative writing instructors in universities suggests that the teaching of poetry has become a central part of the literary landscape in the United States. This raises questions about the impact of this institutionalization on the practice and reception of poetry, as well as on the development of new voices and styles within the art form.

Another possible interpretation of Hacker's quote is that it reflects a broader cultural shift in the way poetry is valued and sustained. The fact that many American poets rely on university positions for their livelihoods may indicate a shift away from traditional patronage models or independent literary pursuits. This trend could be seen as both a reflection of the changing dynamics of the publishing industry and a response to the perceived decline in public support for poetry.

In addition, the quote may also invite consideration of the implications of this reliance on academia for the diversity and inclusivity of American poetry. It raises questions about who has access to these teaching positions and the impact of institutional gatekeeping on the range of voices and experiences represented in American poetry. It also prompts reflection on the potential consequences of this concentration of literary authority within academic institutions.

Overall, Marilyn Hacker's quote prompts a critical examination of the intersection between American literary culture and the role of universities in shaping it. It invites consideration of the economic realities of being a poet, the institutionalization of creative writing within academia, and the broader implications for the diversity and sustainability of American poetry. By raising these questions, the quote encourages a deeper exploration of the complex dynamics that underpin the practice and transmission of poetry in the United States.