Meaning: This quote by Marilyn Hacker addresses the declining value of literature and the study of foreign languages in the United States, as well as the growing dominance of literary theory over the study of actual texts in graduate literature programs. Hacker suggests that creative writing programs play a crucial role in maintaining interest in literature and ensuring that literature courses remain popular. This quote touches upon several important issues within the realm of literary studies, and it invites us to consider the complex relationship between literature, language study, and the evolving landscape of academic literary pursuits.

Firstly, Hacker's observation about the devaluation of literature and the study of foreign languages in the United States reflects a broader societal trend. In recent years, there has been a shift in educational priorities, with a greater emphasis placed on STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) subjects at the expense of the humanities. As a result, traditional literary disciplines have often been marginalized, leading to a decline in the perceived importance of studying literature and foreign languages. This devaluation has implications for the cultivation of critical thinking, cultural understanding, and linguistic proficiency, all of which are traditionally associated with the study of literature and foreign languages.

Furthermore, Hacker's critique of the preponderance of theory over text in graduate literature studies speaks to a significant shift in the academic approach to literary analysis. The dominance of literary theory, particularly in graduate programs, has led to a focus on deconstructing and critiquing literature through various theoretical frameworks, often at the expense of engaging directly with the texts themselves. This trend has sparked debates about the balance between theoretical analysis and the appreciation of literature as an art form, as well as the impact of this shift on students' understanding and enjoyment of literary works.

In this context, Hacker's assertion that creative writing programs help to populate literature courses is significant. Creative writing programs offer a different entry point into the world of literature, one that emphasizes the act of creation and the exploration of language and storytelling. By engaging with the process of writing and storytelling, students in creative writing programs often develop a deep appreciation for literature and language, which can in turn drive their interest in literature courses. Additionally, creative writing programs provide a space for students to actively participate in the literary tradition, fostering a sense of connection to the written word that may not always be cultivated through the exclusive study of literary theory.

Hacker's quote prompts us to consider the role of literature and language study in shaping our understanding of the world, as well as the evolving dynamics within literary academia. It highlights the importance of maintaining a balanced approach to literary education, one that encompasses both critical analysis and creative engagement with literary texts. By recognizing the value of creative writing programs in upholding the relevance of literature courses, we acknowledge the multifaceted nature of literary study and the diverse pathways through which individuals can connect with and contribute to the world of letters.