Meaning: This quote by John Hall highlights the phenomenon of receiving more negative feedback in writing than through direct communication, such as phone calls. Hall suggests that it can be seen as a "cheap shot" for him to share critical letters or emails publicly, as the immediate reaction from the audience tends to be one of sympathy for him and contempt for the critic.

The quote touches upon the dynamics of communication and the impact of public expression of criticism. It reflects the common experience of individuals in the public eye, such as broadcasters, journalists, and public figures, who often receive a significant amount of negative feedback in written form. This feedback can come in the form of letters, emails, comments on social media, or reviews.

The phrase "More negatives write than call" suggests that people are more inclined to express their negative opinions in writing rather than through direct verbal communication. There are several possible reasons for this tendency. Writing allows individuals to carefully craft their thoughts and express themselves without immediate confrontation, which can lead to the articulation of more critical and sometimes harsh opinions. Additionally, the anonymity or perceived distance of written communication may embolden individuals to express their negative views more freely.

When Hall mentions that it's a "cheap shot" for him to go on the air with critical letters or emails, he is likely alluding to the power dynamics at play. By sharing negative feedback publicly, especially in a broadcast or public forum, the individual in the public eye can potentially subject the critic to public scrutiny and backlash. This can lead to a dynamic where the audience reacts with "sympathy for me and contempt for the poor critic," as Hall describes it. The public expression of sympathy for the recipient of the criticism and contempt for the critic can create a sense of imbalance and reinforce the idea that written criticism is less valid or deserving of empathy.

This quote sheds light on the complex interplay between public figures, their audience, and critics. It raises questions about the nature of feedback, the dynamics of public communication, and the impact of public expression of criticism on both the recipient and the critic. The power dynamics inherent in such situations can influence the way criticism is perceived and dealt with, potentially shaping the discourse and the public's perception of the individuals involved.

In conclusion, John Hall's quote captures the imbalance of feedback received in writing versus direct communication, as well as the potential repercussions of publicly sharing critical letters or emails. It offers insight into the dynamics of public communication and the impact of public expression of criticism on individuals in the public eye. The quote prompts reflection on the nature of feedback, the power dynamics at play, and the complexities of managing public perception in the face of criticism.