Meaning: Lawrence Halprin, a renowned architect, landscape architect, and urban designer, made this statement as a reflection of his creative process and the collaborative nature of architectural and urban design projects. In this quote, Halprin emphasizes the importance of reaching a consensus and understanding the essence of what needs to be accomplished before translating these concepts into tangible designs.

Halprin's reference to reaching a consensus underscores the collaborative aspect of design processes, particularly in large-scale projects where multiple stakeholders, including clients, architects, engineers, and other professionals, are involved. The consensus he speaks of is not merely an agreement on superficial elements, but rather a deeper understanding of the fundamental goals and principles that should guide the design process.

By emphasizing the importance of consensus, Halprin acknowledges the diverse perspectives and expertise that contribute to the creation of successful designs. This collaborative approach aligns with the principles of participatory design, where stakeholders are actively engaged in the decision-making process, ensuring that the final design reflects a collective vision and addresses the needs and aspirations of the community it serves.

Furthermore, Halprin's mention of "what really ought to be done" highlights the ethical dimension of design. Beyond aesthetic considerations, architects and designers are tasked with addressing societal needs, environmental concerns, and functional requirements. By seeking consensus on what "ought to be done," Halprin emphasizes the ethical responsibility of design professionals to consider the broader impact of their work and to prioritize solutions that contribute positively to the built environment and the well-being of its users.

The subsequent reference to "then they give it to me and then I draw it" illuminates Halprin's role as the interpreter and executor of the collective vision. As the architect, he takes the synthesized consensus and translates it into tangible designs. However, the act of "drawing" here extends beyond the physical act of sketching or drafting. It encompasses the process of conceptualization, where abstract ideas and philosophical concepts are manifested in the form of architectural and urban design solutions.

This philosophical sense of drawing alludes to the deeper layers of meaning embedded in the design process. It speaks to the ability of architecture and urban design to convey narratives, evoke emotions, and embody cultural and symbolic significance. Through his statement, Halprin invites us to consider the profound philosophical underpinnings that inform the built environment, emphasizing the transformative power of design to shape human experiences and perceptions of space.

In summary, Lawrence Halprin's quote encapsulates the collaborative and ethical dimensions of design, emphasizing the importance of reaching a consensus based on shared values and aspirations. It underscores the role of the architect as both a mediator of collective vision and a philosopher who translates abstract concepts into tangible, meaningful designs. This perspective offers valuable insights into the intricate and multi-faceted nature of architectural and urban design processes, highlighting the interconnectedness of creativity, ethics, and collective engagement.