Meaning: This quote by Kevyn Aucoin, a renowned makeup artist, touches upon the perceived differences between the television and film industries, particularly when it comes to the technical aspects of production, such as lighting. Aucoin's remark reflects a common sentiment within the film and television communities regarding the differences in the quality and approach to lighting in the two mediums.

In the world of filmmaking, lighting is a crucial element that can significantly impact the visual aesthetic and emotional tone of a scene. The use of lighting in film is often considered an art form, with cinematographers and lighting technicians working meticulously to create the desired atmosphere and visual impact. The control and precision involved in film lighting are often seen as a hallmark of the medium, allowing for intricate and nuanced visual storytelling.

On the other hand, Aucoin's comment suggests that the standards for lighting in television may not always align with those of the film industry. It implies that the approach to lighting in television production may be perceived as lacking the same level of artistry and attention to detail as that found in film. This sentiment may stem from the differences in production schedules, budgets, and technical constraints that can impact the level of control and artistry achievable in television lighting.

It's important to note that advancements in television production technology have allowed for significant improvements in the quality of lighting in TV shows. High-definition cameras, sophisticated lighting equipment, and evolving production techniques have enabled television productions to achieve visual standards that rival those of film. However, the perception of a disparity in lighting quality between the two mediums may still persist based on historical differences and varying production practices.

Furthermore, Aucoin's comment can be interpreted as a reflection of the hierarchy and prestige traditionally associated with the film industry in comparison to television. Historically, film has been regarded as the pinnacle of visual storytelling, with a focus on cinematic artistry and auteur-driven creativity. In contrast, television has often been seen as a more commercial and rapidly produced medium, with less emphasis on the craft of filmmaking.

Despite these perceptions, it's important to recognize that the line between film and television has become increasingly blurred in recent years. The rise of high-quality television programming, streaming platforms, and anthology series has challenged traditional distinctions between the two mediums. As a result, the differences in lighting standards and practices between film and television may continue to evolve as both mediums influence and inspire each other.

In conclusion, Kevyn Aucoin's quote serves as a thought-provoking commentary on the perceived disparities in lighting standards between the film and television industries. While his remark may reflect longstanding perceptions and historical differences, it also invites reflection on the evolving nature of visual storytelling and the ongoing convergence of film and television production practices. As technology, creative talent, and audience expectations continue to shape both mediums, the distinctions and debates surrounding lighting in film and television are likely to remain a topic of discussion within the entertainment industry.