Meaning: This quote by Seymour Hersh, a prominent American journalist, provides a thought-provoking perspective on the complex dynamics that drive individuals to pursue careers in the military or law enforcement. Hersh’s statement revolves around the notion that in certain socio-economic environments, individuals may choose to join the armed forces or police not out of a deep-seated desire for combat or enforcement, but rather out of a lack of viable alternatives for supporting themselves and their families.

The quote highlights the idea that economic circumstances and limited opportunities can significantly influence people's career choices. In regions or communities where stable, well-paying jobs are scarce, individuals may view military or law enforcement positions as one of the few viable options for securing a reliable income and benefits. These roles can provide a sense of security and stability for individuals and their families, especially in areas where economic opportunities are limited.

Furthermore, Hersh's statement sheds light on the sacrifices and risks that individuals are willing to endure in pursuit of financial security for their families. The mention of standing in line to "get bombed" underscores the perilous nature of such career paths, particularly in conflict-ridden or volatile regions. Despite the inherent dangers, the willingness of individuals to pursue these professions underscores the urgency and desperation that can underpin their decision-making.

In many cases, joining the military or law enforcement can also be seen as a form of public service and duty to one's community or country. The desire to protect and provide for loved ones, coupled with a sense of duty, can drive individuals to pursue these professions, often at great personal risk. This underscores the complex interplay between economic necessity, personal sacrifice, and a sense of responsibility to one's community or nation.

The quote also prompts reflection on the broader societal and systemic factors that contribute to the phenomenon Hersh describes. It raises questions about the responsibilities of governments and societies to provide diverse and sustainable economic opportunities for their citizens, as well as the role of education, social support systems, and job creation in mitigating the circumstances that push individuals towards high-risk career paths.

In conclusion, Seymour Hersh's quote encapsulates the nuanced motivations and challenges that underlie individuals' decisions to pursue careers in the military or law enforcement, particularly in contexts marked by limited economic opportunities and societal instability. It underscores the complex interplay of economic necessity, personal sacrifice, and a sense of duty, prompting critical reflection on the broader systemic factors at play. Ultimately, the quote invites us to consider the multifaceted dynamics that shape individuals' career choices and the broader societal responsibilities in creating more diverse and sustainable opportunities for livelihood and service.