Meaning: The quote "To write history is so difficult that most historians are forced to make concessions to the technique of legende" by Erich Auerbach encapsulates the complex and challenging nature of historical writing. Erich Auerbach, a German philologist and comparative scholar of literature and languages, was particularly interested in the relationship between language, literature, and history. In this quote, Auerbach suggests that historians often face such formidable obstacles in their attempts to accurately represent the past that they are compelled to resort to techniques that may compromise the integrity of their historical narratives.

Historical writing is a multifaceted and demanding endeavor that requires meticulous research, critical analysis, and careful interpretation of sources. Historians grapple with the inherent limitations of the evidence available to them, which is often incomplete, biased, or subject to interpretation. They must navigate through conflicting accounts, cultural biases, and the challenge of representing diverse perspectives and experiences. As a result, the process of constructing a coherent and truthful historical narrative is fraught with difficulties and complexities.

The notion of "concessions to the technique of legende" alludes to the idea that historians, in their pursuit of historical truth, may find themselves compelled to employ strategies that resemble those used in the creation of legends or myths. This can take various forms, such as filling in gaps in the historical record with speculative interpretations, relying on oral traditions or folklore, or emphasizing certain events or figures to create a more compelling narrative. While such techniques may be employed with the aim of conveying a deeper understanding of the past, they also raise questions about the potential distortion of historical reality.

Auerbach's assertion prompts us to consider the challenges and ethical dilemmas inherent in historical writing. The need to grapple with the complexities of historical interpretation and representation is a recurring theme in the discipline of history. Historians are acutely aware of the limitations of their sources and the potential for bias and distortion in the construction of historical narratives. They must navigate the tension between the desire to convey a nuanced and truthful account of the past and the practical constraints that may necessitate compromises in their approach.

Furthermore, Auerbach’s quote draws attention to the intersection of history and storytelling. The term "legende" suggests a narrative form that involves elements of myth, legend, or folklore. This raises the question of the extent to which historical writing is inherently intertwined with the art of storytelling. Historians are not only researchers and interpreters of evidence but also storytellers who craft narratives that engage and inform their audience. In doing so, they face the challenge of balancing historical accuracy with the need to create a compelling and coherent story.

In conclusion, Erich Auerbach's quote encapsulates the arduous and complex nature of historical writing, highlighting the challenges and dilemmas that historians face in their attempts to represent the past. It serves as a poignant reminder of the intricacies of historical interpretation and the ethical considerations that underpin the construction of historical narratives. By acknowledging the difficulties inherent in writing history, Auerbach’s quote encourages a critical reflection on the complexities of historical scholarship and the ongoing quest for a more comprehensive understanding of the past.