Meaning: The quote you provided is attributed to Elias Hicks, a prominent Quaker minister and religious leader in the United States during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Hicks was known for his theological views and his role in the Quaker schism that led to the formation of the Hicksite and Orthodox branches of the Society of Friends.

In the quote, Hicks appears to be discussing the concept of human nature and the potential for moral and spiritual development. The key points to consider in this quote include the idea of "eternity of probation," the notion that given unlimited time, humans would continue to pursue their own will and gratify their carnal desires. This reflects a perspective on the innate nature of humanity and the challenges of moral and spiritual growth.

Firstly, the concept of "eternity of probation" suggests an endless period for individuals to be tested or judged based on their actions and choices. In many religious traditions, the idea of probation is linked to the notion of a testing period during which individuals are given the opportunity to demonstrate their moral character and spiritual development. However, Hicks' use of "eternity" in this context may imply a rhetorical device to emphasize the futility of providing unlimited time for such probation.

Hicks' assertion that humans would continue to pursue their own will and gratify their carnal desires even with an eternity of probation reflects a skeptical view of human nature. This perspective aligns with traditional Christian theological concepts of human depravity or original sin, which suggest that humans are inherently inclined towards selfishness and sin. Hicks' statement implies that regardless of the duration of the testing period, humans would persist in following their own desires rather than seeking spiritual growth and moral improvement.

The quote can be interpreted as a commentary on the limitations of time in shaping human behavior and character. Hicks seems to be suggesting that the extent of time given for probation would not necessarily lead to positive moral and spiritual development in individuals. This raises questions about the nature of human free will, the potential for genuine moral transformation, and the role of divine intervention or grace in shaping human character.

Hicks' perspective may also be influenced by his broader theological views, particularly his emphasis on the inner light or the presence of the divine within each individual. His skepticism about the effectiveness of an eternity of probation could stem from a belief in the fundamental struggle between human nature and spiritual striving, as well as the need for a deeper spiritual transformation that transcends the limitations of time and human will.

In conclusion, Elias Hicks' quote offers a thought-provoking reflection on the nature of human existence, moral development, and the challenges of spiritual growth. His assertion about the potential futility of an eternity of probation raises important questions about human nature, free will, and the dynamics of moral and spiritual transformation. While the quote reflects a specific theological perspective, it invites broader consideration of timeless philosophical and ethical inquiries about the nature of humanity and the pursuit of virtue.