Meaning: The quote you've provided is attributed to Paul Hirsch, a renowned film editor who has worked on numerous iconic films, including "Star Wars," "Ferris Bueller's Day Off," and "Mission: Impossible." Hirsch's statement sheds light on the role of music in film and how it can impact the viewer's perception of the pacing and rhythm of a movie.

Hirsch's comment suggests that, at the beginning of his career, he preferred to watch films without music. This preference stemmed from his belief that the presence of music could potentially mask the underlying pace of the film. In other words, he felt that the use of music might influence or interfere with his ability to perceive and evaluate the natural rhythm and pacing of the film.

Hirsch's perspective on the impact of music in film editing is intriguing, as it raises the question of how different elements, such as sound, affect our experience as viewers. His approach to initially watching films without music highlights the importance of understanding the fundamental components of a film and how they interact to create a cohesive and engaging viewing experience.

In the context of film editing, the relationship between visual and auditory elements is crucial. Music can significantly enhance a film by evoking emotions, creating atmosphere, and guiding the audience's emotional response to the unfolding narrative. However, Hirsch's viewpoint suggests that, as an editor, he wanted to ensure that the pacing and rhythm of the film were solidly established before incorporating music into the equation.

It's important to note that Hirsch's perspective does not diminish the value of music in film. Instead, it underscores the idea that the editing process should focus on establishing a strong foundation in terms of pacing and rhythm before integrating additional elements such as music. This approach allows for a more deliberate and intentional use of music, ensuring that it complements and enhances the overall cinematic experience without overshadowing or distorting the natural flow of the film.

Hirsch's body of work exemplifies his mastery of film editing, and his insights into the role of music in film provide valuable considerations for aspiring filmmakers and editors. His willingness to share his perspective on this topic offers a glimpse into the thoughtful and meticulous approach that goes into crafting a compelling cinematic narrative.

In conclusion, Paul Hirsch's statement about watching films without music at the start of his career offers a thought-provoking perspective on the interplay between music and film editing. It underscores the importance of establishing a strong foundation in pacing and rhythm before incorporating additional elements, such as music, into the editing process. Hirsch's approach highlights the nuanced considerations involved in crafting a cohesive and impactful cinematic experience, and his insights continue to resonate in the world of film editing and beyond.