Meaning: Thomas Hobbes, a prominent English philosopher, made this statement to highlight the competitive nature of human society and its impact on the way we perceive the works of ancient authors. In essence, Hobbes argues that the praise and admiration for ancient authors are not solely based on respect for the deceased, but rather on the rivalry and jealousy that exist among the living. This quote sheds light on the complex dynamics of human behavior and the ways in which competition and envy can influence our attitudes towards the achievements of others, even those from distant eras.

Hobbes' perspective on the praise of ancient authors can be understood within the context of his broader philosophical ideas. As a key figure in the development of social contract theory, Hobbes was deeply interested in human nature and the dynamics of power and authority within society. His famous work, "Leviathan," explores the concept of the social contract and the role of the sovereign in maintaining order and preventing the chaos that arises from human competition and conflict. In this light, it is clear that Hobbes' quote reflects his broader concerns about the nature of human relationships and the underlying motivations that drive our actions.

The idea that the praise of ancient authors is rooted in the competition and envy of the living raises important questions about the nature of cultural and intellectual admiration. It suggests that our appreciation for the works of the past may be influenced by our own desires for recognition and status, rather than a genuine reverence for the achievements of those who came before us. This perspective challenges the notion of a purely objective and disinterested evaluation of historical and literary accomplishments, pointing to the ways in which personal and social dynamics can shape our perceptions of the past.

Moreover, Hobbes' statement invites us to consider the interplay between individual ambition and collective cultural attitudes. The notion of "mutual envy of the living" implies that the competition for recognition and success is a driving force in shaping the way we value and prioritize the contributions of historical figures. This observation resonates with contemporary discussions about the politics of canon formation, the recognition of marginalized voices, and the power dynamics that influence the construction of cultural and intellectual hierarchies.

In the context of intellectual history, Hobbes' quote prompts us to critically examine the ways in which the legacy of ancient authors has been shaped by the agendas and biases of subsequent generations. It challenges us to consider the extent to which our interpretation of historical texts and figures is influenced by the social and cultural contexts in which they are received. This perspective encourages a more nuanced and self-aware approach to engaging with the intellectual and literary traditions of the past, one that acknowledges the complex interplay of personal ambition, social competition, and the construction of cultural value.

In conclusion, Thomas Hobbes' assertion that the praise of ancient authors proceeds from the competition and mutual envy of the living offers a thought-provoking perspective on the dynamics of cultural and intellectual admiration. By highlighting the role of human competition and ambition in shaping our attitudes towards the achievements of the past, Hobbes invites us to critically reflect on the complex interplay of personal motivations, social dynamics, and historical interpretation. This quote serves as a reminder of the intricate ways in which our relationships with the past are mediated by the dynamics of human society, challenging us to approach the appreciation of ancient authors with a more discerning and self-reflective lens.