Meaning: This quote, attributed to the English painter, printmaker, and social critic William Hogarth, reflects an interesting perspective on the subject of art criticism. Hogarth, who is best known for his satirical engravings and paintings that portrayed the moral and social issues of his time, suggests that those who have studied painting the least are often the best judges of it.

In interpreting this quote, it's important to consider the context in which Hogarth lived and worked. During the 18th century, the art world was undergoing significant changes, with the rise of the Royal Academy of Arts in London and the establishment of formal academic training for artists. This institutionalization of art education led to the development of specific techniques, styles, and rules that artists were expected to adhere to. However, it also created a divide between those who had received formal training and those who had not.

Hogarth's statement challenges the notion that expertise in painting or art history is a prerequisite for being able to appreciate and critique art. Instead, he seems to be suggesting that a fresh, unencumbered perspective—one not bound by the conventions and expectations of the art world—can offer valuable insights into the true essence and impact of a work of art.

One possible interpretation of this quote is that a deep understanding of technique and theory may lead to a more critical and analytical approach to art, potentially overlooking the emotional and intuitive responses that art can evoke. In contrast, those who have not been formally trained may approach art with a sense of openness and immediacy, allowing them to connect with the underlying emotions and messages conveyed by the artwork.

Hogarth's comment also raises questions about the nature of expertise and authority in the realm of art criticism. While formal education can certainly provide a strong foundation for understanding artistic principles and historical contexts, it does not necessarily guarantee a more insightful or meaningful interpretation of art. Conversely, an individual's personal experiences, cultural background, and emotional sensibilities can greatly influence their ability to engage with and understand art on a profound level.

Furthermore, the quote may also be seen as a commentary on the potential elitism and exclusivity that can permeate the art world. By suggesting that those with less formal training are often the best judges of painting, Hogarth challenges the idea that only a select few are qualified to evaluate and appreciate art. This perspective aligns with his broader social criticism, as seen in his works such as "Marriage A-la-Mode" and "Gin Lane," which often targeted the hypocrisy and moral decay of the upper classes.

In conclusion, William Hogarth's quote offers a thought-provoking perspective on the nature of art criticism, expertise, and the role of formal education in shaping our perceptions of art. It invites us to consider the value of diverse perspectives, emotional resonance, and the potential limitations of specialized knowledge when it comes to understanding and evaluating works of art. This quote encourages us to approach art with an open mind and a willingness to engage with it on a personal and emotional level, regardless of our level of formal training or expertise in the field of painting.