Meaning: The quote by Anthony Holden sheds light on the tendency of civil servants, particularly diplomats from the Foreign Office, to become entrenched in the status quo and detached from public opinion once they enter the political arena. Holden, a prominent journalist and biographer, offers a critical perspective on the behavior and mindset of these individuals, highlighting the potential consequences of their disconnection from the real world.

Holden's characterization of civil servants and diplomats as being "riveted to the status quo" suggests a resistance to change or a reluctance to challenge existing norms and practices. This portrayal aligns with the notion that individuals working within bureaucratic systems often prioritize stability and adherence to established protocols over innovation and responsiveness to shifting public sentiment.

Furthermore, Holden's assertion that these individuals "lose track of public opinion in the real world" underscores the potential disconnect between decision-makers and the broader populace. This observation raises important questions about the effectiveness of governance and policymaking when those in positions of influence become insular and detached from the concerns and perspectives of the people they are meant to serve.

The reference to civil servants and diplomats being "very pleasant, intelligent people" adds a layer of nuance to Holden's critique. It acknowledges the personal qualities and capabilities of these individuals while highlighting the impact of institutional dynamics on their behavior and decision-making. This acknowledgment serves as a reminder that the issue at hand is not one of personal character but rather of systemic influences and organizational culture.

The implications of Holden's quote extend beyond the specific context of civil servants and diplomats to encompass broader discussions about power, governance, and public accountability. It prompts reflection on the potential pitfalls of institutionalized decision-making and the challenges of maintaining a responsive and inclusive approach to governance.

In contemporary society, the dynamics described by Holden are relevant to discussions about the role of government institutions, the influence of bureaucracy, and the imperative of staying attuned to the needs and aspirations of the public. As societies grapple with complex issues ranging from economic inequality to environmental sustainability, the capacity of decision-makers to remain connected to the realities of people's lives becomes increasingly crucial.

Holden's quote also invites consideration of the mechanisms and practices that can help counteract the tendencies he identifies. It prompts exploration of strategies for fostering greater empathy, understanding, and engagement within governance structures, as well as the importance of promoting diversity of perspectives and experiences in decision-making processes.

In conclusion, Anthony Holden's quote offers a thought-provoking commentary on the potential for civil servants and diplomats to become disconnected from public opinion and entrenched in the status quo. By calling attention to this phenomenon, Holden contributes to a broader conversation about the dynamics of governance, the impact of institutional culture, and the imperative of maintaining responsiveness to the real-world concerns of citizens. His words serve as a reminder of the ongoing need for critical reflection and reform within systems of governance to ensure that they remain in tune with the needs and aspirations of the people they serve.