Meaning: The quote by Samuel Hopkins, a clergyman, reflects the moral and ethical dilemma surrounding the institution of slavery. In the quote, Hopkins questions the justification for holding slaves in bondage and suggests that if it is not considered a sin or a violation of justice and humanity, then there would be no need to expend effort and resources to free them. This statement encapsulates the complex and contentious nature of the debate over slavery and the moral imperative to confront and address such injustices.

During the 18th and 19th centuries, when Hopkins was active, the institution of slavery was deeply entrenched in many societies, particularly in the United States. The quote reflects the moral and ethical struggle faced by individuals who were grappling with the contradiction between the principles of justice, humanity, and the practice of enslaving other human beings. Hopkins, as a clergyman, likely drew upon religious teachings and ethical principles to question the morality of holding slaves in bondage.

The quote underscores the idea that if the act of holding slaves in bondage is not considered a sin or a violation of justice and humanity, then efforts to free them would be seen as futile or unnecessary. This perspective sheds light on the rationalizations and justifications that were used to perpetuate the institution of slavery, as well as the moral and ethical challenges to abolish it.

The historical context of the quote is crucial to understanding its significance. During Hopkins' lifetime, the transatlantic slave trade and the enslavement of African people were prevalent in many parts of the world. The economic interests of slave owners and the social structures built upon the exploitation of enslaved individuals created powerful barriers to the abolition of slavery. The quote captures the entrenched attitudes and beliefs that sought to legitimize and perpetuate the institution of slavery.

Hopkins' words also reflect the broader debate over the moral and economic implications of slavery. The notion of whether it was a sin or a violation of justice and humanity to hold slaves in bondage was a central point of contention among religious, political, and philosophical thinkers of the time. The quote represents a challenge to the prevailing attitudes and practices that condoned the subjugation and exploitation of enslaved individuals.

Furthermore, the quote raises questions about the role of individuals and society in confronting moral injustices. By framing the issue in terms of sin, justice, and humanity, Hopkins challenges the conscience of those who were complicit in or indifferent to the suffering of enslaved people. The quote serves as a call to action, urging individuals to critically examine the ethical implications of their actions and to consider the moral imperative to oppose systems of oppression and exploitation.

In conclusion, Samuel Hopkins' quote encapsulates the moral and ethical complexities surrounding the institution of slavery. It challenges the rationalizations and justifications used to perpetuate slavery while emphasizing the moral imperative to confront and address such injustices. By questioning the morality of holding slaves in bondage, Hopkins contributes to the broader discourse on the abolition of slavery and the ethical responsibilities of individuals and society in combating oppression and promoting justice and humanity.