Meaning: The quote you've provided is a thought-provoking statement by Samuel Hopkins, a prominent clergyman and theologian in the 18th century. In this quote, Hopkins addresses the controversial issue of slavery and questions the moral implications of enslaving fellow human beings. He specifically challenges the notion that the historical practice of slavery among the people of Israel should serve as a justification for contemporary societies to engage in similar acts of subjugation and exploitation.

Hopkins begins by acknowledging that according to the biblical narrative, God permitted the people of Israel to make and possess slaves. This acknowledgment reflects an understanding of the historical context in which the practice of slavery was prevalent and accepted in many ancient societies, including the Israelites. However, Hopkins does not use this historical precedent as a basis for justifying or condoning the institution of slavery in his own time.

Instead, he poses a rhetorical question that challenges the moral conscience of his audience. He asks whether the historical permission granted to the people of Israel to have slaves should be interpreted as a blanket license for contemporary individuals to enslave, kill, and seize the property of their fellow human beings at will. By framing the issue in this manner, Hopkins forces his audience to confront the ethical implications of their actions and decisions regarding the treatment of others.

From a theological perspective, Hopkins' quote reflects a critical examination of the interpretation and application of religious texts and principles in the context of social and moral issues. He emphasizes the need for ethical discernment and moral responsibility in interpreting ancient religious teachings, particularly in relation to practices such as slavery that have significant social and human rights implications.

In the broader historical and social context of the 18th century, when Hopkins was active, the institution of slavery was a contentious and divisive issue. The transatlantic slave trade and the widespread ownership of enslaved individuals were central to the economies of European colonial powers and their American colonies. The moral and ethical debates surrounding the abolition of slavery were gaining momentum, fueled by the Enlightenment ideals of individual rights, liberty, and equality.

Hopkins' quote can be seen as part of this broader discourse on the morality of slavery and the treatment of fellow human beings. His challenge to the notion of using historical precedent as a justification for contemporary practices reflects a commitment to moral reasoning and ethical reflection in addressing complex social and moral issues.

In conclusion, Samuel Hopkins' quote serves as a powerful reminder of the need for critical moral reflection and ethical discernment in addressing issues of social justice and human rights. By questioning the moral implications of historical permissions and practices, Hopkins challenges his audience to consider the ethical dimensions of their actions and decisions, particularly in the context of the contentious issue of slavery. His words continue to resonate as a call to conscientious moral reasoning and a reminder of the enduring relevance of ethical considerations in the face of social and moral challenges.