Meaning: This quote by Hugh Hopper, a renowned musician, touches upon the concept of creativity and originality in the arts. Hopper suggests that in any artistic field, only a small percentage of individuals possess true creativity and originality, while the majority tend to follow or imitate the work of others. This idea provokes a deeper reflection on the nature of creativity, the pursuit of originality, and the dynamics of influence and imitation within the arts.

Creativity and originality are often seen as the driving forces behind artistic innovation and progress. The ability to think outside the box, to break away from conventions, and to create something entirely new is a rare and valuable trait. Hopper's assertion that only around ten percent of people in the arts demonstrate these qualities highlights the scarcity of true creative genius. This observation aligns with the romanticized notion of the solitary, visionary artist who is able to revolutionize their field through sheer originality.

However, it's important to consider the implications of Hopper's statement. While it suggests that the vast majority of artists are mere imitators or followers, it also raises questions about the nature of influence and the role of tradition in the arts. It's worth noting that even the most original artists are shaped by the influences of their predecessors and contemporaries. The line between influence and imitation can be blurry, and many artists consciously engage with existing traditions and styles while seeking to put their own unique stamp on their work.

Moreover, the quote prompts a consideration of the broader societal and cultural factors that may impact the distribution of creativity within the arts. It's possible that systemic barriers, such as unequal access to education, resources, and platforms, could limit the realization of creative potential for many individuals. Additionally, the commercialization and commodification of art may incentivize conformity and replication rather than genuine innovation.

In light of Hopper's words, it's also worth exploring the nature of originality itself. What does it mean to be truly original in a world where so much artistic ground has already been covered? Some theorists argue that all art is essentially derivative and that true originality is an illusion. From this perspective, the distinction between the ten percent of "creative, original" individuals and the rest who are "following on, copying" becomes less clear-cut.

Ultimately, Hopper's quote offers a thought-provoking perspective on the dynamics of creativity and originality within the arts. It invites us to consider the complex interplay of individual talent, cultural influences, and societal structures that shape the landscape of artistic expression. Whether one agrees with the ten percent figure or not, the quote serves as a catalyst for contemplating the nature of creativity and the myriad factors that impact its cultivation and expression in the arts.

In conclusion, Hopper's quote encourages us to critically examine the nature of creativity and originality in the arts. It prompts us to consider the influences, traditions, and societal dynamics that shape artistic expression, and challenges us to reflect on the elusive nature of true originality. While the ten percent figure may be a simplification, the underlying questions it raises are fundamental to understanding the complexities of artistic innovation and imitation.