Meaning: The quote by Paul Auster sheds light on his interest in French poetry and how it led him to undertake translation work as a means of earning a living. Auster is a renowned American author, known for his works that blend elements of existentialism, crime fiction, and postmodernism. In this quote, Auster reflects on his early career and the role that translation played in sustaining him financially.

Auster's fascination with French poetry suggests a deep appreciation for the art form beyond his own creative endeavors. He describes it as a "sideline" to his own work, indicating that his primary focus was on his own writing. However, his interest in French poetry was significant enough to lead him to the task of translating contemporary French poets. This demonstrates not only his passion for the art form but also his proficiency in the French language, as translation is a complex and demanding process that requires a deep understanding of both the source and target languages.

The notion of translation as a means of earning money is a common reality for many writers and literary enthusiasts. Auster's candid acknowledgment that translation became a way for him to "put bread on the table" underscores the practical aspect of his decision to engage in this type of work. It also highlights the challenges faced by writers and artists in sustaining themselves financially while pursuing their creative passions. Despite his own literary aspirations, Auster found himself drawn to translation as a viable source of income, emphasizing the pragmatic nature of his involvement in this practice.

The act of translation itself is a form of creative expression, albeit one that operates within the constraints of linguistic and cultural fidelity. Translators are tasked with capturing the essence of a text in a different language while preserving its original meaning, style, and cultural nuances. Auster's experience as a translator would have required him to navigate these complexities, honing his skills in language and literary interpretation. His dedication to this craft, born out of necessity, likely deepened his understanding of the intricacies of both French and English literature.

Auster's journey from being interested in French poetry to becoming a translator is a testament to the multifaceted nature of literary pursuits. While his primary focus remained on his own writing, his foray into translation speaks to the interconnectedness of creative endeavors and the ways in which they can intersect and inform each other. Through his translation work, Auster not only sustained himself financially but also expanded his literary horizons, engaging with the works of contemporary French poets and contributing to the dissemination of their art to a wider audience.

In conclusion, Paul Auster's reflection on his interest in French poetry and the role of translation in his career offers valuable insights into the symbiotic relationship between creative passion and practical necessity. His experience serves as a reminder of the diverse paths that writers and artists may traverse in pursuit of their craft, and the ways in which these paths can converge and enrich their artistic journeys. Auster's willingness to embrace translation as a means of livelihood underscores the resilience and adaptability required to thrive in the literary world, highlighting the enduring allure of language and literature across cultural boundaries.