Meaning: This quote by James Humes, a lawyer and former presidential speechwriter, offers an insightful perspective on the use of humor and jokes in speeches. Humes suggests that while he appreciates wit and humor, he is not fond of jokes in speeches. He draws a comparison between jokes and humor, likening jokes to pornography in the context of erotic language in a good novel.

Humes' comparison between jokes and humor to pornography and erotic language in literature is thought-provoking. It implies that jokes, like pornography, may be seen as crass or lacking in depth, while humor, akin to erotic language in a good novel, possesses a certain sophistication and subtlety. This analogy underscores the idea that humor, when used effectively, can add depth and richness to a speech, while jokes may come across as cheap or superficial.

The distinction between jokes and humor in speeches is an important one to consider, especially for individuals who engage in public speaking or speechwriting. While jokes are often characterized by their punchline-driven nature and tendency to provoke immediate laughter, humor encompasses a broader range of elements such as irony, satire, and clever observations. Humor, when skillfully employed, has the potential to engage audiences on a deeper level, encouraging them to think critically and appreciate the speaker's cleverness and insight.

The preference for humor over jokes in speeches may also stem from the desire to maintain a certain level of decorum and respect for the audience. Jokes that rely on stereotypes, offensive language, or inappropriate subject matter can easily backfire and alienate listeners. In contrast, humor that is thoughtful, inclusive, and relevant to the topic at hand can create a positive and enjoyable experience for the audience.

Moreover, Humes' viewpoint suggests a recognition of the power dynamics at play in the use of humor in speeches. While jokes may sometimes serve to belittle or mock others, humor has the potential to uplift and unite individuals through shared laughter and understanding. By advocating for the use of wit and humor over jokes, Humes encourages speakers to wield their words responsibly and ethically, mindful of the impact their language can have on their audience.

In the realm of public speaking, the distinction between jokes and humor also ties into the concept of authenticity. A reliance on canned jokes or one-liners may come across as insincere or contrived, diminishing the speaker's credibility. On the other hand, the skillful use of humor that reflects the speaker's genuine personality and perspective can strengthen their connection with the audience and convey a sense of authenticity and relatability.

In conclusion, James Humes' quote offers valuable insights into the nuanced art of using humor in speeches. By highlighting the distinction between jokes and humor and drawing an analogy to literature, Humes prompts us to consider the depth, impact, and ethical implications of our use of humor in public speaking. His perspective encourages speakers and speechwriters to prioritize wit and humor that is thoughtful, inclusive, and authentic, ultimately aiming to engage and uplift their audience.