Meaning: Roy Ayers, an American funk, soul, and jazz composer and vibraphone player, made this statement to shed light on the music industry's traditional practice of artists signing contracts directly with record companies, resulting in the ownership of their music by the record label. However, Ayers chose a different approach by working through a production company, thereby retaining greater control and ownership of his music.

In the music industry, the relationship between artists and record companies is governed by contracts that outline the terms of the partnership. These contracts often involve the transfer of ownership of the artist's music to the record company in exchange for financial support, marketing, and distribution. This arrangement has been the norm for many years, with record companies exerting significant control over the production, promotion, and distribution of the artist's work.

Ayers' decision to work through a production company instead of signing directly with a record label reflects a desire for greater autonomy and creative control. By doing so, he was able to maintain ownership of his music and negotiate terms that aligned with his artistic vision and career goals. This approach allowed him to have a more active role in the production process and maintain a higher degree of artistic freedom.

The ownership of music is a crucial aspect of an artist's career, as it directly impacts their ability to profit from their creative work and maintain control over its use. When artists sign contracts with record companies, they often relinquish ownership rights to their music, which can limit their ability to benefit financially from its exploitation in various forms, such as licensing for films, commercials, or other media.

Ayers' decision to work through a production company highlights the importance of exploring alternative models within the music industry that empower artists to retain ownership and control over their creative output. This approach not only allows artists to benefit more directly from their music but also enables them to make strategic decisions regarding its use and distribution.

Additionally, Ayers' experience demonstrates the potential for artists to achieve success and maintain creative independence by forging partnerships with production companies or exploring other non-traditional avenues for releasing and promoting their music. This approach may provide artists with more leverage in negotiating favorable terms and maintaining ownership of their work, ultimately leading to a more sustainable and fulfilling career in the music industry.

In conclusion, Roy Ayers' decision to work through a production company instead of signing directly with a record label underscores the significance of ownership and control in the music industry. By taking this alternative approach, Ayers was able to maintain ownership of his music and exercise greater creative autonomy. His experience serves as a valuable example for artists seeking to navigate the complexities of the music business while preserving their artistic integrity and financial interests.