Meaning: The quote by journalist Gwen Ifill refers to the response of Democrats to Howard Dean's outspoken and sometimes controversial statements. To fully understand the context of the quote, it's important to have some background information about Howard Dean and his role in the Democratic Party.

Howard Dean is a prominent figure in the Democratic Party and has been involved in politics for several decades. He served as the Governor of Vermont from 1991 to 2003 and ran for the Democratic nomination for President in 2004. Dean's presidential campaign was known for its grassroots approach and strong opposition to the Iraq War, which resonated with many progressive and anti-war Democrats.

After his presidential bid, Dean became the chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) from 2005 to 2009. During his tenure, he implemented a "50-state strategy" to build up the party's infrastructure and presence in traditionally Republican-leaning states, with the goal of making the Democratic Party competitive nationwide.

In the quote, Ifill suggests that many Democrats are not as upset with Dean as one might expect, despite his tendency to make inflammatory statements. This speaks to the complex relationship between Dean and the Democratic Party, as well as the broader dynamics of political discourse and activism within the party.

One interpretation of Ifill's quote is that some Democrats appreciate Dean's willingness to speak his mind and take bold stances, even if they are controversial. This could be seen as a reflection of a broader sentiment within the party that values authenticity and outspokenness, particularly in the face of political opposition.

Dean's unapologetic approach may also be viewed as a response to the perceived lack of assertiveness from other Democratic leaders. In a political landscape often characterized by cautious messaging and compromise, Dean's refusal to back down from his statements could be seen as a refreshing departure from the norm.

Furthermore, Dean's approach may be seen as a reflection of the shifting dynamics within the Democratic Party at the time. The early 2000s saw the emergence of a more vocal and assertive progressive wing within the party, which sought to push back against the perceived centrism and accommodationism of the party establishment.

It's important to note that Dean's approach also garnered criticism from some Democrats and political observers. His outspoken nature and tendency to make controversial statements could be seen as potentially divisive or damaging to the party's image, particularly when it came to reaching out to more moderate or conservative voters.

In conclusion, Gwen Ifill's quote sheds light on the complex and nuanced relationship between Howard Dean and the Democratic Party. Dean's unapologetic and outspoken approach may have resonated with some Democrats who valued authenticity and boldness, while also sparking criticism from those who were concerned about the potential impact of his statements. The quote captures a moment in the party's history when the dynamics of political discourse, activism, and leadership were in flux, reflecting broader tensions and aspirations within the Democratic Party.