Meaning: This quote by Dean Inge succinctly captures the essence of conflict and the futility of seeking resolution when one party is unwilling to change. The analogy of sheep passing resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains carnivorous is a powerful metaphor for situations where one party is committed to a certain course of action, despite the desires or efforts of others.

In essence, the quote speaks to the asymmetry of power and the reality that it only takes one party to initiate or perpetuate a quarrel. It highlights the inherent imbalance in situations where one party holds the power or influence to dictate the terms of a conflict, while the other is left to pass resolutions or seek change in vain.

The imagery of the sheep and the wolf serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges inherent in attempting to reconcile differing opinions or desires when one party is inherently opposed to change. The inherent nature of the wolf as a carnivorous predator and the sheep as a herbivorous prey animal underscores the fundamental differences in their interests and instincts.

The quote also raises questions about the nature of conflict and the dynamics of power and influence. It prompts us to consider the role of agency and the extent to which individuals or groups can effect change in situations where power differentials are stark and entrenched.

Furthermore, the quote can be interpreted as a commentary on the limitations of diplomacy and negotiation in the face of unyielding opposition. It suggests that in certain situations, efforts to seek compromise or resolution may be futile if one party is unwilling to engage in good faith.

From a broader perspective, the quote can be applied to various contexts, including interpersonal relationships, political dynamics, and social justice issues. It serves as a reminder of the challenges inherent in seeking change or resolution in situations where power differentials are significant and entrenched.

In conclusion, Dean Inge's quote serves as a powerful reminder of the asymmetry of power and the challenges inherent in seeking resolution when one party is unwilling to change. It prompts us to consider the dynamics of conflict, the limitations of diplomacy, and the complexities of power and influence in various contexts. The imagery of the sheep and the wolf provides a compelling metaphor for the inherent struggles and imbalances in situations where differing opinions and desires collide.