Meaning: This quote by Robert Ingersoll, a 19th-century lawyer and orator known for his skepticism and criticism of organized religion, presents a thought-provoking commentary on the potential consequences of adhering strictly to the teachings of the Old and New Testaments. In just a few words, Ingersoll manages to encapsulate a complex and controversial viewpoint regarding the moral and ethical implications of following these religious texts.

The first part of the quote suggests that if a person were to strictly adhere to the teachings of the Old Testament in today's society, they would be considered a criminal. This assertion can be interpreted in several ways. One interpretation is that the moral and legal standards of contemporary society have evolved to such an extent that certain actions or beliefs prescribed in the Old Testament are now deemed criminal or unethical. This could refer to practices such as stoning individuals for certain offenses, engaging in warfare against neighboring tribes, or enforcing strict codes of conduct that are incongruent with modern legal and ethical norms.

Another interpretation of this statement is that the Old Testament contains injunctions and commandments that are no longer compatible with the moral and legal framework of contemporary society. For example, certain moral precepts or regulations regarding slavery, the treatment of women, or the punishment of certain offenses may be deemed unacceptable or criminal by today's standards. In this sense, Ingersoll's assertion highlights the stark contrast between the ethical principles outlined in the Old Testament and the prevailing moral values of the present day.

The second part of the quote posits that strict adherence to the teachings of the New Testament would lead a person to insanity. This assertion can be understood in a variety of ways as well. One interpretation is that the ideals and principles espoused in the New Testament, such as turning the other cheek, loving one's enemies, and embracing self-sacrifice, may be perceived as impractical or nonsensical within the context of the complexities and challenges of contemporary life. Ingersoll's statement could be suggesting that the radical and unconditional nature of these teachings, if rigorously followed, could potentially lead to a state of psychological or emotional instability.

Additionally, the assertion that strict adherence to the New Testament would result in insanity may also be a critique of the perceived irrationality or unfeasibility of certain doctrines or beliefs promulgated in the New Testament. The concept of forgiveness, the renunciation of material possessions, and the emphasis on spiritual rather than material concerns may be viewed as incompatible with the demands and realities of modern existence, prompting Ingersoll to characterize such adherence as a form of insanity.

In summary, Robert Ingersoll's quote encapsulates a provocative perspective on the moral and ethical implications of adhering strictly to the teachings of the Old and New Testaments. By highlighting the potential criminality associated with following the Old Testament and the perceived insanity linked to strict adherence to the New Testament, Ingersoll prompts readers to consider the evolving relationship between religious teachings and contemporary moral and ethical standards. Whether one agrees or disagrees with his assertions, the quote undoubtedly invites reflection and critical examination of the enduring relevance and applicability of ancient religious texts in the modern world.