Meaning: The quote in question is from journalist Michael Isikoff, who made this statement during a televised discussion on the potential jailing of journalist Matt Cooper. This statement reflects the broader debate about the role of journalists and the freedom of the press in the context of legal and ethical issues.

Isikoff's quote is significant because it raises the question of the public's reaction to a journalist being imprisoned for protecting a source. Matt Cooper, a journalist for Time magazine, was involved in a high-profile case in 2005 in which he faced potential jail time for refusing to reveal his sources in the investigation into the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity. The case sparked a broader conversation about the rights and responsibilities of journalists to protect their sources, as well as the potential consequences they may face for doing so.

The quote captures the concern and potential outrage that many people may feel in response to a journalist being jailed for upholding the principles of source protection. It highlights the emotional impact that such a situation could have on the public, as well as the broader implications for press freedom and the public's right to information.

In the context of the quote, Isikoff's statement reflects the sentiment that the potential imprisonment of a journalist for protecting a source would be deeply troubling to many. This sentiment is rooted in the fundamental role of the press in a democratic society, where journalists serve as watchdogs and hold those in power accountable. The ability of journalists to maintain the confidentiality of their sources is seen as essential for uncovering and reporting on important issues, particularly those that involve government or corporate misconduct.

The quote also speaks to the potential chilling effect that the prosecution of journalists could have on the freedom of the press. If journalists are held legally liable for protecting their sources, it could deter potential whistleblowers from coming forward with important information, and limit the public's access to critical news and information.

Furthermore, the quote underscores the broader ethical and legal considerations surrounding the protection of sources. Journalists often face difficult decisions when it comes to revealing the identities of their sources, as they balance their obligation to report the truth with the need to protect those who provide them with information. In many cases, journalists have argued that protecting the confidentiality of sources is crucial for maintaining trust and obtaining vital information that serves the public interest.

Overall, Isikoff's quote captures the complex and contentious nature of the debate surrounding press freedom, source protection, and the potential consequences faced by journalists who uphold these principles. It reflects the deep-seated concerns about the implications of imprisoning journalists for fulfilling their professional and ethical duties, and the broader impact on the public's right to information in a democratic society.