Meaning: The quote "For governments at war, the media is an instrument of war or an element in war that is to be controlled" by Bruce Jackson, a public servant, highlights the complex relationship between governments and the media during times of conflict. This statement raises important questions about the role of the media in shaping public perception, disseminating information, and influencing the outcome of war.

During times of war, governments often seek to control the flow of information to the public and the international community. The media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and can have a significant impact on the support for military actions and the overall outcome of a conflict. As a result, governments often view the media as a tool that can be used to advance their own agendas and shape the narrative of the war.

The idea that the media is an "instrument of war" suggests that it can be used as a strategic tool to influence public opinion, rally support for military actions, and shape the perception of the enemy. In this context, the media becomes a battleground where competing narratives and propaganda are disseminated in an effort to gain the upper hand in the war of ideas. Governments often seek to control the media to ensure that their own version of events is given prominence and to limit the dissemination of information that may be detrimental to their war efforts.

However, the quote also suggests that the media can be seen as an "element in war that is to be controlled." This implies that the media is not only a tool to be wielded by governments but also a factor that must be managed and regulated to prevent it from undermining the war effort. Governments may seek to control the media through censorship, propaganda, or other means in order to ensure that the information being disseminated aligns with their objectives and does not jeopardize their strategic interests.

The relationship between governments and the media during times of war is complex and multifaceted. On the one hand, the media plays a crucial role in providing the public with information about the conflict, holding the government accountable, and serving as a check on the exercise of power. On the other hand, the media can also be co-opted by governments to serve their own interests, disseminate propaganda, and shape public opinion in support of the war effort.

The quote by Bruce Jackson raises important questions about the ethical and moral responsibilities of the media in times of conflict. It challenges us to consider the extent to which the media should be controlled or manipulated by governments and the implications of such control for freedom of expression, democratic principles, and the public's right to know.

In conclusion, the quote "For governments at war, the media is an instrument of war or an element in war that is to be controlled" encapsulates the complex and often contentious relationship between governments and the media during times of conflict. It highlights the strategic importance of the media as a tool for shaping public opinion and influencing the outcome of war, as well as the challenges and ethical considerations that arise when governments seek to control the flow of information during wartime. Ultimately, this quote prompts us to critically examine the role of the media in times of war and the implications of government control over the dissemination of information.