Meaning: Irving Babbitt, an American literary critic and cultural philosopher, made the statement, "A person who has sympathy for mankind in the lump, faith in its future progress, and desire to serve the great cause of this progress, should be called not a humanist, but a humanitarian, and his creed may be designated as humanitarianism." This quote reflects Babbitt's views on the distinction between humanism and humanitarianism, as well as his emphasis on the importance of serving the greater cause of progress for humanity. To understand the significance of Babbitt's words, it is essential to delve into the context of his ideas and the implications of his distinction between humanism and humanitarianism.

Babbitt was a prominent figure in the intellectual and cultural landscape of the early 20th century, known for his critique of modernity and his advocacy for a return to classical humanist principles. His ideas were shaped by his disillusionment with the direction of Western civilization, particularly the perceived decline of moral and spiritual values in the face of rapid industrialization and materialism. Babbitt's critique of humanism, as articulated in the quote, stems from his belief that traditional humanism had become detached from a genuine concern for the well-being of humanity as a whole.

In Babbitt's view, humanism had evolved into a self-centered philosophy that emphasized individualism and personal fulfillment at the expense of a broader commitment to the common good. By contrast, Babbitt saw humanitarianism as a creed that prioritized the collective welfare of mankind and the advancement of civilization. His distinction between the two terms reflects a deeper philosophical divide between an inward-focused, self-interested humanism and an outward-focused, altruistic humanitarianism.

Babbitt's emphasis on "sympathy for mankind in the lump" underscores his belief in the importance of cultivating a sense of compassion and solidarity towards all members of the human family. This stands in contrast to a more selective or exclusive form of empathy that is limited to certain groups or individuals. By invoking "faith in its future progress," Babbitt highlights the forward-looking nature of humanitarianism, which is oriented towards the continual improvement and advancement of human society. This emphasis on progress aligns with Babbitt's broader concerns about the need for moral and cultural renewal in the face of what he saw as the moral and spiritual malaise of his time.

Furthermore, Babbitt's assertion that those who embody these qualities should be called humanitarians rather than humanists reflects his desire to reclaim the term "humanitarian" from its more limited connotations. By associating humanitarianism with a broader and more encompassing vision of human welfare and progress, Babbitt sought to reframe the discourse around humanism and its implications for the betterment of society.

In summary, Irving Babbitt's quote captures his critique of traditional humanism and his advocacy for a more inclusive and forward-looking humanitarianism. His distinction between the two terms reflects his concern with the direction of modern civilization and his belief in the importance of a creed that prioritizes the collective welfare of humanity. Babbitt's ideas continue to provoke reflection and discussion about the ethical and philosophical foundations of human-centered ideologies and their implications for the future of humanity.