Meaning: This quote by Randall Jarrell, an American poet and literary critic, delves into the perception of politicians in society. Jarrell's quote suggests that when we encounter an honest and intelligent politician, we tend to view them as an exception to the norm rather than representative of politicians as a whole. In other words, our preconceived notions about politicians remain unchanged despite encountering individuals who do not fit the stereotypical image of a politician.

The quote highlights the pervasive skepticism and cynicism that often surrounds the political class. It implies that the general perception of politicians is so deeply ingrained in society that even when presented with evidence to the contrary, people are quick to dismiss it as an anomaly rather than a reflection of the broader group. This speaks to the enduring mistrust and disillusionment that many people feel towards those in positions of political power.

In examining this quote, it is important to consider the broader context of political discourse and public opinion. Politicians are often viewed with suspicion due to a variety of factors, including scandals, broken promises, and perceived self-interest. This has led to a widespread belief that politicians are inherently untrustworthy and that their actions are guided more by personal gain than the public good.

The notion of an "honest and intelligent politician" being viewed as an exception raises questions about the expectations and standards to which politicians are held. It suggests that honesty and intelligence are not commonly associated with the political sphere, and that when these qualities are observed, they are seen as atypical rather than integral to the role of a politician. This perpetuates a cycle of low expectations and skepticism towards those in power.

Jarrell's quote also speaks to the power of societal categorization and the persistence of stereotypes. The idea that encountering a few honest and intelligent politicians does not alter our overarching perception of the category of politicians demonstrates the strength of ingrained beliefs and the resistance to change. It suggests that people are quick to generalize and categorize based on preconceived notions, even in the face of contradictory evidence.

Furthermore, the quote raises important questions about the role of individual responsibility and agency in shaping public perceptions. If society continues to view politicians through a lens of distrust and skepticism, it becomes a self-perpetuating cycle where the expectation of dishonesty and incompetence becomes the norm. This has implications for the functioning of democratic systems and the ability of politicians to effectively govern and gain the trust of their constituents.

In conclusion, Randall Jarrell's quote encapsulates the enduring cynicism and skepticism that surrounds the perception of politicians in society. It sheds light on the entrenched nature of these beliefs and the reluctance to challenge or revise them, even in the face of contradictory evidence. By prompting reflection on the persistence of stereotypes and societal categorization, the quote invites us to consider the broader implications of our perceptions of politicians and the impact they have on the functioning of political systems.