Meaning: Karl Jaspers, a renowned German psychiatrist and philosopher, made this statement, reflecting on his dissatisfaction with the study of law and his subsequent turn to psychology. Jaspers was a prominent figure in existentialist thought and made significant contributions to the fields of psychiatry and philosophy. His statement provides insight into the reasons behind his shift from law to psychology and sheds light on his perspective on the limitations of legal studies.

In this quote, Jaspers expresses his dissatisfaction with the study of law, indicating that it left him feeling unfulfilled. He explains that his dissatisfaction stemmed from the fact that he did not understand the aspects of life that law served. This suggests that Jaspers sought a deeper understanding of human existence and the fundamental questions that underlie our experiences, which he found lacking in the study of law.

Furthermore, Jaspers highlights his perception of the study of law as being centered on intricate mental juggling with fictions that did not interest him. This observation points to his critique of the abstract and theoretical nature of legal studies, which he found to be disconnected from the real, lived experiences of individuals. Jaspers was more interested in exploring the complexities of human existence and the genuine concerns of individuals, which led him to seek an alternative path in psychology.

Jaspers' decision to pursue psychology can be seen as a response to his dissatisfaction with the limitations of legal studies. By turning to psychology, he aimed to delve deeper into the human mind, emotions, and behaviors, seeking a more profound understanding of the human experience. His work in psychology, particularly in the realm of existential psychology, focused on the exploration of existential questions and the subjective experiences of individuals, reflecting his desire to engage with the fundamental aspects of life that he felt were lacking in the study of law.

Overall, Jaspers' quote provides valuable insight into his intellectual journey and his motivations for shifting from the study of law to psychology. It reflects his dissatisfaction with the abstract and theoretical nature of legal studies and his quest for a deeper understanding of the human experience. Jaspers' subsequent contributions to psychology and existentialist thought demonstrate his commitment to addressing the fundamental aspects of life that he felt were missing in the study of law.