Meaning: The quote "Who, then, will govern? The answer must be, Man - for we have no angels in the shape of men, as yet, who are willing to take charge of our political affairs" by Andrew Johnson, the 17th President of the United States, reflects a sentiment of pragmatic realism regarding the governance of human societies. It underscores the idea that while human beings are imperfect and fallible, they are the only viable option for political leadership.

Andrew Johnson's presidency, which began in 1865 following the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, was marked by the complexities and challenges of the post-Civil War era in the United States. His quote captures the essence of the political landscape during that time, where the task of governance was entrusted to human beings, acknowledging their inherent imperfections.

In the context of this quote, "angels in the shape of men" serves as a metaphor for individuals who possess exceptional moral virtue, wisdom, and selflessness – qualities often associated with angelic beings. Johnson's reference to the absence of such individuals in the realm of politics implies a recognition of the limitations and shortcomings of human leaders. However, he also emphasizes that despite these imperfections, it is ultimately human beings who must step forward to govern and manage political affairs.

The quote can be interpreted as a call to action, challenging individuals to take responsibility for the governance of society rather than waiting for idealized or flawless leaders to emerge. It acknowledges the reality that political leadership is a human endeavor, and as such, it is subject to all the complexities, strengths, and frailties inherent in human nature.

Johnson's words also carry a tone of practicality and urgency. He suggests that in the absence of "angels in the shape of men," there is a pressing need for capable and willing individuals to assume the responsibilities of governance. This sentiment resonates with the broader historical and political context of the post-Civil War period, during which the nation faced the immense task of reconstruction and reconciliation.

Furthermore, Johnson's quote raises profound questions about the nature of political leadership, the qualities required of those who govern, and the challenges inherent in the exercise of power. It prompts reflection on the balance between idealized notions of leadership and the practical realities of human governance.

In contemporary society, Johnson's quote remains relevant as it speaks to enduring themes of leadership, representation, and the complexities of political authority. It serves as a reminder that while the pursuit of virtuous and exemplary leadership is noble, the practical work of governance ultimately falls to flawed yet capable human beings.

In conclusion, Andrew Johnson's quote encapsulates a sobering yet pragmatic perspective on the governance of human societies. It acknowledges the absence of perfect leaders while affirming the necessity for individuals to step forward and undertake the responsibilities of political leadership. It speaks to the enduring complexities and challenges of governance, resonating with timeless considerations of political authority and the human condition.