Meaning: This quote by Denis Johnson provides insight into his approach to writing for different publications. Johnson was an American writer known for his novels, short stories, and poetry. His works often explored themes of redemption, addiction, and the human experience. In this quote, Johnson juxtaposes two distinct publications, Esquire and American Scholar, to underscore the varying styles and audiences he encounters as a writer.

Esquire is a well-known men's magazine that covers a wide range of topics, including fashion, culture, and politics. It is known for its sharp, stylish writing and its ability to capture the zeitgeist of contemporary American life. Writing for Esquire would require a different approach compared to writing for a publication like American Scholar.

American Scholar, on the other hand, is a quarterly magazine dedicated to essays, fiction, poetry, and reviews. It is published by the Phi Beta Kappa Society and is known for its intellectual rigor and commitment to exploring ideas in depth. The audience for American Scholar is likely to be more academically inclined and interested in thought-provoking, scholarly content.

When Johnson states, "When I'm writing for Esquire, my conscious thought is, I'm not writing for American Scholar," he is highlighting the need to adapt his writing style and content to suit the specific publication and its audience. This reflects an understanding of the different expectations, tones, and subject matter that each publication demands.

For Esquire, Johnson may need to consider a more direct, accessible writing style that resonates with a broader readership. The content may need to be engaging, relevant, and perhaps even provocative to capture the attention of the magazine's audience. On the other hand, writing for American Scholar would necessitate a more scholarly, erudite approach, delving into complex ideas and engaging with academic discourse.

By acknowledging the distinction between these two publications, Johnson demonstrates an awareness of the importance of tailoring his writing to suit the specific context. This adaptability is a valuable skill for any writer, as it allows them to effectively communicate with diverse audiences and explore a range of subjects and themes.

In essence, Johnson's quote encapsulates the idea that writing is not a one-size-fits-all endeavor. Different publications have different aims and audiences, and a thoughtful writer must be conscious of these nuances. By recognizing the unique demands of each publication, a writer can craft content that is well-suited to the readership and the publication's overall ethos.

Overall, Denis Johnson's quote provides a glimpse into the mindset of a writer who understands the importance of tailoring his work to fit the specific publication he is writing for. It reflects an appreciation for the diversity of audiences and the need to adapt one's writing style and content accordingly. This quote serves as a reminder of the art of writing, which involves not only the creation of compelling content but also the skillful navigation of different publishing contexts.