Meaning: The quote you provided is from Nancy Johnson, a former American politician who served as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1983 to 2007. In this quote, she reflects on her personal experience with physical fitness and the balance between strength training and functionality. Let's break down the quote to understand its meaning and implications.

Nancy Johnson starts by acknowledging her previous focus on "the big bulk thing," indicating that she was once dedicated to building significant muscle mass, likely through weightlifting or other strength training exercises. She humorously contrasts the outcome of her efforts by stating that her legs resemble those of a cyclist rather than a shooter. This comparison suggests that her previous approach to fitness resulted in developing muscular legs more akin to an endurance athlete like a cyclist, as opposed to a shooter who would require a different physical build and skill set.

However, Johnson then expresses a shift in her perspective, suggesting that she has reconsidered the idea of pursuing excessive muscle mass. She states, "I think there is a point to where too much is not a good thing," indicating a realization that there can be negative consequences or diminishing returns associated with pushing the boundaries of muscular development. This insight reflects a nuanced understanding of physical fitness and the potential drawbacks of pursuing extreme levels of strength or bulk.

Furthermore, Johnson provides insight into her revised approach to training, mentioning her focus on "lowering my center of gravity by doing a lot of legs." This statement indicates a shift towards emphasizing functional strength and agility, rather than solely pursuing aesthetic or size-based goals. By prioritizing exercises that target the lower body and core, she aims to enhance her stability and mobility, aligning with the concept of lowering her center of gravity. This approach suggests a more holistic view of fitness, considering how strength and muscle development can contribute to overall physical capabilities and performance.

In the context of the quote, Nancy Johnson's words offer valuable insights into the evolving perspectives on fitness and training. Her acknowledgment of the potential drawbacks of excessive muscle mass aligns with contemporary discussions within the fitness and bodybuilding communities. The concept of "functional strength" has gained prominence, emphasizing the importance of developing strength and mobility that directly translate to improved performance in daily activities, sports, or other physical pursuits.

Johnson's reflection also touches on the idea of balance in fitness pursuits. While dedicated strength training can yield numerous benefits, there is a recognition that an excessive focus on bulking up may not necessarily align with individual goals or optimal physical function. Her words underline the importance of considering one's unique objectives and finding a balanced approach to training that supports overall well-being and functionality.

Overall, Nancy Johnson's quote provides a thoughtful perspective on the complexities of physical fitness and the evolving understanding of strength training. It serves as a reminder to consider the broader implications of our fitness goals and to strive for a balanced approach that aligns with our individual needs and aspirations.