Meaning: The quote "Well, I think there are artists who are more or less contemporary with Hopper who are more relevant" by Donald Judd, a prominent figure in the art world, reflects his perspective on the relevance of certain artists in comparison to Edward Hopper, an iconic American realist painter. This quote is significant in the context of art history and criticism, as it invites a critical examination of the notion of relevance and contemporaneity in the realm of visual arts.

Donald Judd, known for his contributions to minimalism and his outspoken views on art and aesthetics, was likely making a nuanced statement about the enduring influence and significance of artists who were working around the same time as Hopper. By suggesting that there are artists from Hopper's era who are "more relevant," Judd prompts us to consider the evolving nature of artistic relevance and the dynamic ways in which artists' legacies are evaluated over time.

In interpreting Judd's statement, it is essential to delve into the context of Edward Hopper's artistic legacy. Hopper, who gained renown for his evocative depictions of American life and urban landscapes, is widely celebrated for his distinct style and profound impact on 20th-century art. His paintings, such as "Nighthawks" and "Morning Sun," have become iconic symbols of modern American art, captivating viewers with their emotive and introspective qualities. Hopper's ability to capture the essence of urban isolation and the interplay of light and shadow has solidified his status as a seminal figure in the art world.

However, Judd's assertion that there are artists contemporary to Hopper who are "more relevant" raises thought-provoking questions about the criteria for assessing an artist's relevance. It implies that the passage of time and shifting cultural contexts may lead to the reevaluation of artistic significance. Judd's perspective challenges us to consider the diversity of artistic voices during Hopper's era and to recognize the potential for alternative narratives and contributions that may have been overlooked or undervalued.

Moreover, Judd's emphasis on relevance invites contemplation about the evolving nature of artistic resonance and the ways in which artists engage with and reflect the complexities of their contemporary world. In the context of Hopper's era, the mid-20th century, there were numerous artists working across diverse movements and styles, each grappling with the social, political, and cultural upheavals of their time. Judd's statement encourages us to explore the richness and diversity of artistic production during this period and to critically reassess the impact and significance of artists beyond the confines of traditional art historical narratives.

Furthermore, Judd's assertion sparks a dialogue about the enduring relevance of art and the ways in which artists continue to resonate with contemporary audiences. By suggesting that certain artists from Hopper's time are "more relevant," Judd prompts us to consider how artistic expressions endure, evolve, and remain pertinent in our ever-changing world. This notion challenges us to look beyond the confines of a specific historical moment and to recognize the timeless themes and universal truths that artists convey through their work.

In conclusion, Donald Judd's quote regarding the relevance of artists contemporary to Edward Hopper offers a compelling entry point for exploring the dynamic nature of artistic significance and the multifaceted dimensions of artistic legacies. By provoking critical reflection on the evaluation of artists' relevance and contemporaneity, Judd's statement encourages a nuanced exploration of the diverse voices and contributions within the art world. It beckons us to reconsider the enduring impact of artists from Hopper's era and to embrace a more expansive and inclusive understanding of artistic relevance in the broader context of cultural history.