Meaning: The quote "Above all, it is not decency or goodness of gentleness that impresses the Middle East, but strength" by Meir Kahane, a controversial American-Israeli Orthodox rabbi and founder of the Jewish Defense League, reflects a perspective on the dynamics of power and perception in the Middle East. Meir Kahane was known for his provocative and polarizing views on Israeli politics, Arab-Jewish relations, and the role of strength in international affairs. This quote encapsulates his belief that in the context of the Middle East, strength holds greater sway than qualities such as decency or gentleness.

In the Middle East, the concept of strength has deep historical and cultural roots. The region has been shaped by a complex tapestry of conflicts, power struggles, and geopolitical rivalries. Throughout history, various empires, dynasties, and nation-states have vied for dominance in the region, often resorting to displays of military might and force to assert their influence. This historical backdrop has contributed to a prevailing mindset in which strength is highly valued and often equated with security, survival, and the ability to withstand external threats.

Meir Kahane's assertion that strength impresses the Middle East speaks to the realpolitik of the region, where nations and leaders are often judged by their capacity to project power and defend their interests. In a volatile and uncertain geopolitical landscape, the perception of strength can be a crucial factor in shaping alliances, deterrence strategies, and negotiations. This is evident in the region's history, where both internal and external actors have sought to cultivate an image of strength to bolster their positions and influence the behavior of others.

Furthermore, the quote also hints at the perceived inadequacy of qualities such as decency or gentleness in garnering respect or influence in the Middle East. In a context where security concerns, territorial disputes, and ideological rivalries loom large, traits associated with empathy or conciliation may be viewed as secondary to the imperatives of survival and assertiveness. This is not to say that these qualities are inherently devalued in the region, but rather that the prevailing emphasis on strength as a primary currency of influence can overshadow other virtues in the eyes of many.

Meir Kahane's perspective on strength in the Middle East must also be understood within the context of his own ideological and political outlook. As a vocal advocate for Jewish nationalism and a staunch critic of Arab nationalism, Kahane's views were often framed by a confrontational and uncompromising stance towards Arab-Jewish relations. His belief in the primacy of strength may have been informed by his perception of the enduring struggle for survival and dominance in the region, as well as his own controversial proposals for addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

In conclusion, Meir Kahane's quote encapsulates a provocative and contentious viewpoint on the role of strength in shaping perceptions and exerting influence in the Middle East. It reflects the complex interplay of history, geopolitics, and competing narratives that have contributed to the significance of strength as a defining factor in the region. While the quote may not capture the full spectrum of perspectives on power and influence in the Middle East, it offers a glimpse into the mindset of a figure whose ideas continue to provoke debate and scrutiny.