Meaning: This quote by Justin Kaplan reflects on the impact of television on communal memory. Television has become a ubiquitous presence in modern society, with its ability to disseminate information and entertainment to a wide audience. However, despite its enormous reach, Kaplan suggests that television has made a relatively small contribution to the collective memory of society.

When examining the quote, it's important to consider the concept of communal memory. Communal memory refers to the shared recollections and experiences of a community or society. It encompasses the collective understanding of historical events, cultural traditions, and societal norms that are passed down through generations. Communal memory plays a vital role in shaping a society's identity and understanding of its past.

Kaplan's assertion that television has added "pitifully few lines" to communal memory raises thought-provoking questions about the nature of television and its impact on society. One interpretation of this statement is that television, despite its pervasive influence, has not significantly contributed to the enduring narratives and shared memories that form the foundation of communal identity.

There are several factors that may help explain Kaplan's perspective. Firstly, the transient nature of television content could be a contributing factor. Television programs, news broadcasts, and commercials are broadcasted and then often quickly forgotten as new content takes its place. Unlike printed material or oral traditions, television does not necessarily lend itself to being preserved and passed down through generations.

Moreover, the sheer volume of television content produced and consumed daily may dilute its impact on communal memory. With an abundance of channels, streaming services, and on-demand content, the collective attention of viewers is fragmented across a wide array of programming. As a result, individual television shows or events may struggle to leave a lasting imprint on communal memory amidst the constant influx of new content.

Additionally, the commercial and entertainment-driven nature of television may influence its ability to contribute meaningfully to communal memory. Advertisements, celebrity culture, and sensationalized news stories often dominate television programming, potentially overshadowing more substantial contributions to collective understanding and historical remembrance.

It's also worth considering the role of other mediums, such as literature, art, and oral traditions, in shaping communal memory. These forms of expression have historically played a central role in preserving and transmitting cultural narratives and historical knowledge. Television's relatively recent emergence as a mass medium may mean that it has not yet had the opportunity to deeply embed itself within communal memory in the same way as these more established forms of communication.

In conclusion, Justin Kaplan's quote invites contemplation on the impact of television on communal memory. While television has undoubtedly transformed the way information and entertainment are disseminated, its influence on the enduring narratives and shared memories that form communal memory may be more limited than initially assumed. By critically examining the dynamics of television and its relationship to communal memory, we can gain valuable insights into the complex interplay between media, culture, and societal remembrance.