Meaning: Elia Kazan, the renowned film and theater director, made this statement in his autobiography, "A Life," reflecting on his personal identity and values. The quote sheds light on Kazan's self-perception as an individual who did not conform to the collective mindset or the bohemian lifestyle, but rather saw himself as an elitist.

Kazan's assertion of being an elitist can be understood in the context of his upbringing and experiences. Born in 1909 in Constantinople (now Istanbul) to Greek parents, Kazan immigrated to the United States as a young child. Growing up in a working-class environment, he encountered the challenges of assimilation and strived for upward mobility. This background likely influenced his self-identification as an elitist, as he sought to distinguish himself from the circumstances of his upbringing and align with a more refined and exclusive ethos.

In the realm of artistic and intellectual pursuits, Kazan's elitism may have manifested in his pursuit of excellence and his preference for high standards. As a director, he was known for his meticulous attention to detail and his insistence on achieving the highest quality in his work. This commitment to excellence aligns with the notion of elitism as a dedication to superior achievement and a rejection of mediocrity.

Furthermore, Kazan's identification as an elitist can be viewed in the context of his career in the entertainment industry. Throughout his life, he associated with and worked alongside some of the most talented and influential figures in theater and film. His collaborations with renowned playwrights such as Tennessee Williams and Arthur Miller, as well as his direction of classic films like "A Streetcar Named Desire" and "On the Waterfront," positioned him at the forefront of artistic innovation and cultural impact. In this sense, Kazan's elitism can be seen as a reflection of his participation in and contribution to a select, esteemed sphere of artistic endeavor.

It is important to note that Kazan's self-identification as an elitist may also be viewed in light of the controversies surrounding his testimony before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) in 1952. During the McCarthy era, Kazan named former colleagues and friends who were suspected of having Communist sympathies, a decision that generated significant backlash and divided opinions about his moral character. This episode may have further shaped Kazan's perception of himself as an individual apart from the collective, as he faced both condemnation and support for his actions, reinforcing his self-image as an independent thinker and actor.

In conclusion, Elia Kazan's assertion of being an elitist encapsulates his self-perception as a person who valued excellence, distinction, and individuality. It reflects his personal journey, his professional accomplishments, and the complexities of his legacy. Whether one agrees or disagrees with Kazan's self-description, his statement provides insight into the nuanced nature of identity and the multifaceted dimensions of personal and artistic integrity.

I hope this provides a comprehensive understanding of the quote and its context. If you need further information or have any specific questions, feel free to ask.