Meaning: The quote by Arthur Keith, a Scottish anatomist and physical anthropologist, delves into the concept of Universalism and its reception by people and governments. Universalism is a philosophical and theological concept that emphasizes the universal principles of humanity and the belief in the universal salvation of all people. Keith's quote suggests that while governments have historically imposed Universalism on their subjects, it has not been willingly embraced by the people themselves.

The concept of Universalism has been a subject of debate and discussion for centuries. It encompasses ideas about the fundamental unity and equality of all human beings, regardless of their differences in culture, race, or belief systems. Proponents of Universalism argue that it promotes compassion, understanding, and a sense of shared humanity, while critics often point to the complexities and challenges in applying universal principles across diverse societies.

Keith's assertion that "Nowhere is Universalism welcomed and encouraged by a people" suggests a skepticism about the organic embrace of Universalism by individuals and communities. It implies that the widespread acceptance of Universalism has been more of a top-down imposition by governing bodies rather than a grassroots movement originating from the people themselves. This perspective raises questions about the authenticity and sustainability of Universalism when it is not embraced voluntarily by those it seeks to encompass.

The second part of the quote, "everywhere governments have forced and are forcing Universalism upon unwilling and resistant subjects," highlights the historical and ongoing role of governments in promoting Universalism. Throughout history, various governments have sought to impose universalistic ideologies, laws, and policies on their populations, often encountering resistance and reluctance from those affected. This imposition can take different forms, including attempts to standardize religious beliefs, cultural practices, or legal systems across diverse populations.

One example of such governmental imposition of Universalism is the spread of colonialism, where European powers imposed their cultural, political, and economic systems on indigenous populations across the globe. This often led to the erosion of traditional practices and beliefs, as well as the marginalization of local cultures in favor of a universalized European model. Similarly, in more recent history, governments have sought to enforce universal human rights standards, often facing resistance from societies with deeply ingrained cultural or religious traditions that conflict with these principles.

The quote implies a tension between the ideals of Universalism and the practical challenges of implementing them in diverse societies. It raises important questions about the balance between promoting universal values and respecting the autonomy and diversity of different communities. While Universalism may hold aspirational value in promoting equality and justice, the manner in which it is imposed or promoted can significantly impact its reception and effectiveness.

In conclusion, Arthur Keith's quote encapsulates the complex dynamics surrounding the concept of Universalism, shedding light on the historical imposition of universal principles by governments and the varying degrees of acceptance by the people. It prompts reflection on the challenges and implications of promoting universal values in diverse societies, emphasizing the importance of genuine engagement and dialogue in fostering a more inclusive and equitable world.