Meaning: This quote by John Kellogg, a businessman, reflects on the experience of having a book condemned shortly after it was printed or prepared for printing. Kellogg describes holding the book "in plates" for nearly a year, waiting to see the outcome of the ensuing discussion. This quote captures the sense of anticipation and uncertainty that arises when a work is met with condemnation or controversy. It also speaks to the author's willingness to wait and observe the unfolding of events before making any further decisions about the book.

The notion of a book being condemned as soon as it is printed or set up for printing highlights the potential for contentious or provocative content to provoke strong reactions. It suggests that the act of publishing and disseminating ideas can be met with immediate criticism or opposition. This can be particularly true for works that challenge established beliefs, norms, or power structures, as they may provoke discomfort, backlash, or attempts to suppress their dissemination.

Kellogg's decision to hold the book "in plates" for a year demonstrates a deliberate and cautious approach to managing the fallout from the book's condemnation. The term "in plates" refers to the printing plates used in the production of the book, and Kellogg's choice to hold the book in this form indicates a strategic pause in the publication process. This decision allowed him to assess the situation, observe the ongoing discussion, and perhaps consider how best to proceed in light of the controversy surrounding the book.

The quote also raises questions about the nature of the discussion that followed the condemnation of the book. What were the arguments and perspectives that emerged during this period? How did the public and critical reception of the book evolve over the course of the year? Kellogg's decision to wait and observe suggests a willingness to engage with the discourse surrounding the book and to take into account the various reactions and opinions that surfaced.

Moreover, the quote hints at the broader themes of patience, resilience, and the passage of time in the face of adversity. In the context of creative or intellectual work, it is not uncommon for controversial or pioneering ideas to encounter resistance and condemnation. Kellogg's decision to wait for a year before taking further action reflects a commitment to allowing the issues surrounding the book to unfold and perhaps settle over time. It also speaks to the resilience required to weather criticism and controversy, as well as the patience needed to navigate such challenges.

In conclusion, John Kellogg's quote encapsulates the experience of encountering condemnation and controversy surrounding a book, as well as the deliberation and patience required to navigate such a situation. It sheds light on the dynamics of public discourse, the challenges of managing contentious content, and the resilience of creators and thinkers in the face of opposition. Kellogg's decision to hold the book in plates for a year serves as a testament to the complexities and uncertainties inherent in the process of publishing and engaging with ideas in a public forum.