Meaning:
The quote "It is much safer to obey than to rule" by Thomas Kempis, a German-Dutch canon regular of the late medieval period, reflects a fundamental aspect of human nature and the dynamics of power and responsibility. In this quote, Kempis suggests that being in a position of obedience or subordination is less risky and potentially less burdensome than being in a position of authority or leadership. This notion has been a subject of contemplation and debate for centuries, and it continues to hold relevance in various contexts, including politics, business, and personal relationships.
One interpretation of this quote is that assuming a position of leadership or authority entails significant responsibility and accountability. Those in positions of power often bear the weight of decision-making, and their actions and choices can have far-reaching consequences. As a result, the potential for criticism, backlash, and even personal risk is heightened for those in leadership roles. On the other hand, individuals who choose to obey or follow the directives of others may feel a sense of security, as they are not burdened with the weight of making critical decisions or facing the repercussions of their choices.
From a historical perspective, the quote can be viewed through the lens of the medieval period in which Kempis lived. During this time, hierarchical structures and obedience to authority were deeply ingrained in social, religious, and political systems. The quote may have been influenced by the prevailing attitudes toward obedience, submission, and the perceived safety of adhering to established power structures. In the context of religious institutions, obedience to religious authorities and adherence to doctrines were considered virtues, while assuming positions of leadership within the church carried immense responsibilities and risks.
In contemporary society, the quote remains relevant in the context of leadership and followership dynamics. In the corporate world, for example, executives and managers often grapple with the pressures and risks associated with decision-making, resource allocation, and organizational outcomes. The quote speaks to the notion that assuming a position of authority in a corporate setting can be fraught with challenges, including the potential for failure, criticism, and personal liability. Conversely, employees who adhere to directives and carry out assigned tasks may perceive themselves as facing fewer risks and enjoying a sense of security in their subordinate roles.
On a broader societal level, the quote can also be examined in the context of political leadership and governance. Elected officials and heads of state shoulder immense responsibility for the welfare and security of their constituents. The risks and challenges associated with governance, including the potential for public backlash, opposition, and even personal threats, are inherent in assuming such leadership roles. Meanwhile, citizens who adhere to laws and policies may perceive themselves as facing fewer personal risks and enjoying the security of societal order.
From a psychological standpoint, the quote can be interpreted through the lens of individual temperament and risk tolerance. Some individuals may feel more comfortable in roles that offer a sense of security and predictability, preferring to follow the lead of others rather than assume the uncertainties and pressures of leadership. This inclination toward obedience over rulership may stem from a desire to avoid confrontation, make decisions, or shoulder the consequences of one's actions.
In conclusion, the quote "It is much safer to obey than to rule" by Thomas Kempis encapsulates timeless reflections on the dynamics of power, responsibility, and risk. It invites contemplation on the inherent challenges and potential risks of assuming positions of leadership, as well as the perceived safety and security associated with obedience and subordination. Whether considered in historical, organizational, or individual contexts, the quote continues to provoke thoughtful exploration of human nature and the complexities of authority and followership.