Meaning: The quote by Jonathan King, a musician and former record producer, raises an important question about the allocation of resources towards investigating historical situations that seemingly have no immediate impact or relevance. This quote appears to reflect King's frustration with the allocation of significant financial and human resources into investigating historical events without clear justification or current complaints.

The phrase "Who authorised the spend of millions of pounds and thousands of man hours" suggests that King is questioning the decision-making process behind the allocation of such substantial resources. The use of the word "authorised" implies a level of oversight and approval, indicating that King is seeking accountability for the decision to invest such significant funds and manpower.

The reference to "a stale, historical situation from three decades ago" highlights King's perception of the situation as outdated and lacking in current relevance. This characterization suggests that King sees the investment in investigating this historical event as unnecessary or misplaced, particularly given the passage of time and absence of recent complaints or issues related to the situation.

The phrase "with virtually no complaints made" underscores King's incredulity at the perceived lack of current grievances or concerns related to the historical situation in question. This observation further bolsters his argument that the allocation of resources towards investigating this particular issue appears unwarranted and disproportionate.

It is worth noting that Jonathan King himself has been involved in a highly publicized historical situation, as he was convicted in 2001 of sexual offenses against minors. Given this context, it is possible that King's quote may also reflect his personal experiences and perspective on the allocation of resources towards historical investigations.

In a broader sense, the quote raises important questions about the prioritization of resources and the justification for investing in the investigation of historical events. It prompts reflection on the factors that drive decisions to allocate significant funds and manpower towards addressing past situations, especially when there is a perceived lack of current relevance or complaints.

From a societal standpoint, the quote may resonate with individuals who question the allocation of public funds and resources towards historical inquiries that do not appear to have a direct impact on current issues or concerns. It may also spark discussions about the importance of balancing the pursuit of historical justice with the need to address pressing contemporary challenges.

Overall, Jonathan King's quote serves as a thought-provoking commentary on the allocation of resources towards investigating historical situations, challenging the justification for such investments in the absence of current complaints or relevance. It invites critical consideration of the decision-making processes and priorities that drive the allocation of significant financial and human resources in the pursuit of historical inquiries.