Meaning: The quote by Michael King, a prominent New Zealand historian, reflects on the sense of identity and belonging that characterized New Zealand in the mid-20th century. King's recollection of his childhood in the 1940s and early 1950s highlights the prevailing perception of New Zealand as an integral part of the British Commonwealth, with a strong connection to Britain and a shared British identity among the population.

During this period, New Zealand, like many other former British colonies, maintained a close relationship with Britain, both politically and culturally. The influence of British colonial rule and the legacy of British settlement had a significant impact on the development of New Zealand's societal norms, governance structures, and cultural practices. As a result, the notion of being "British" was deeply ingrained in the collective consciousness of New Zealanders, shaping their sense of national identity and belonging.

The concept of "home" was often associated with Britain, as King recalls his parents and grandparents speaking of Britain in this manner. This reflects the enduring emotional and cultural ties that many New Zealanders felt towards the "mother country," despite the geographical distance. The idea of Britain as a symbolic and cultural homeland for New Zealanders underscores the profound influence of British traditions, values, and customs on the country's social fabric.

Moreover, the notion of being part of the Commonwealth further strengthened the sense of unity and shared identity among New Zealanders. The Commonwealth, a political association of former British colonies and dominions, provided a framework for cooperation and mutual support among its member nations. For New Zealand, being part of the Commonwealth signified a sense of belonging to a broader community of nations with historical ties to Britain, reinforcing the country's attachment to its British heritage.

However, it is essential to recognize that King's reflection captures a specific historical period, characterized by a particular socio-political context. The mid-20th century marked a time when the influence of British colonialism and imperialism still loomed large, shaping the identities and perceptions of nations like New Zealand. The aftermath of World War II also contributed to a sense of shared sacrifice and solidarity among Commonwealth countries, further cementing their interconnectedness and common values.

In contemporary times, the dynamics of New Zealand's national identity have evolved, reflecting the country's growing multiculturalism, indigenous resurgence, and shifting geopolitical relationships. The latter half of the 20th century witnessed a gradual reorientation of New Zealand's identity away from a solely British-centric perspective towards a more inclusive and diverse sense of national belonging. The rise of Maori cultural revitalization movements, increased immigration from non-British backgrounds, and the reevaluation of New Zealand's historical narratives have all contributed to a redefinition of the country's identity.

In conclusion, Michael King's quote encapsulates a bygone era in New Zealand's history, where the perception of the country as a British outpost and a proud member of the Commonwealth was deeply entrenched in the collective consciousness. It serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring legacy of British influence on New Zealand's national identity while also prompting reflection on the evolving nature of identity in a post-colonial, globalized world.