Meaning: This quote by Fredrik Bajer, a Danish writer and politician, reflects a deep understanding of the complexities of influencing people's beliefs and convictions. Bajer's words convey the notion that changing someone's deeply held beliefs or persuading them to adopt a new perspective is not a simple task. In the context of the quote, Bajer appears to be addressing his fellow members of parliament, acknowledging the limitations of written appeals in bringing about genuine conversion or change in individuals' viewpoints.

The quote suggests that the act of conversion, in this context referring to a change in beliefs or convictions, is a complex and multifaceted process that cannot be achieved through a mere letter of appeal. Bajer's choice of words, particularly the emphasis on the need for "a great deal more" than a letter of appeal, underscores the depth of the challenge involved in influencing individuals' deeply entrenched perspectives. It implies that genuine conversion requires a more profound and sustained effort, possibly involving a range of persuasive strategies and forms of engagement.

One interpretation of the quote is that Bajer is cautioning against the oversimplification of the process of persuasion and conversion. He seems to be addressing the members of parliament, reminding them of the limitations of relying solely on written appeals or superficial attempts to sway individuals' beliefs. Instead, Bajer's words suggest that achieving genuine conversion requires a deeper understanding of the complexities involved, as well as a recognition of the need for more comprehensive and nuanced approaches to persuasion.

Furthermore, the quote may also be seen as a commentary on the nature of human conviction and the challenges of altering established viewpoints. Bajer's assertion that "if a man has not already been converted" implies that individuals' existing beliefs are not easily swayed by a letter of appeal or by external influence alone. This recognition of the resilience of entrenched beliefs speaks to the psychological and emotional investment that individuals often have in their convictions, making the process of conversion a formidable task.

In a broader societal context, Bajer's quote holds relevance in discussions of persuasion, influence, and the dynamics of social change. It prompts reflection on the limitations of traditional forms of communication, such as written appeals, in bringing about meaningful shifts in attitudes and beliefs. It suggests that the process of effecting genuine conversion or change requires a more comprehensive and nuanced approach that takes into account the complexity of human psychology and the factors that underpin individuals' convictions.

From a political standpoint, the quote may also be interpreted as a commentary on the challenges faced by policymakers and leaders in navigating public opinion and effecting change. Bajer's acknowledgment of the limitations of letters of appeal within the context of a parliamentary setting underscores the need for more robust and multifaceted strategies in shaping public discourse and garnering support for legislative or policy initiatives.

In conclusion, Fredrik Bajer's quote encapsulates a profound insight into the challenges of influencing individuals' beliefs and achieving genuine conversion. It serves as a reminder of the complexity and depth of the process of persuasion, highlighting the limitations of simplistic approaches to changing deeply held convictions. Bajer's words prompt contemplation on the multifaceted nature of human conviction and the need for more comprehensive and nuanced strategies in the pursuit of genuine conversion and social change.