Meaning: Fredrik Bajer, a Danish writer and politician, is known for his advocacy of peace and his work in the international peace movement. The quote, "As a result of my study, I came to the conclusion that a common supreme authority was undesirable," reflects Bajer's position on the issue of centralized power and authority. This statement is rooted in Bajer's belief in the importance of decentralized governance and the potential risks associated with a single overarching authority.

Bajer's perspective on the undesirability of a common supreme authority can be understood within the context of his broader views on peace and international relations. Throughout his career, Bajer was a staunch advocate for disarmament and the resolution of conflicts through peaceful means. He was a co-founder of the Inter-Parliamentary Union and played a key role in the development of the modern peace movement.

In the quote, Bajer expresses his skepticism towards the idea of a common supreme authority, suggesting that such a concentration of power could potentially lead to negative consequences. Bajer's position aligns with the broader philosophical and political debates surrounding the balance of power, sovereignty, and governance. His concerns about a common supreme authority may stem from the potential for abuse of power, lack of accountability, and the erosion of individual liberties within such a system.

Bajer's stance on the issue of a common supreme authority also reflects his commitment to the principles of autonomy and self-determination. His advocacy for decentralized governance and a multipolar world order aligns with his belief in the importance of nations retaining their sovereignty and making decisions that are in the best interest of their citizens. Bajer's perspective can be seen as a reflection of the broader tensions between centralized authority and the autonomy of individual states in the context of international relations.

Furthermore, Bajer's position on the undesirability of a common supreme authority can be viewed in light of historical and contemporary efforts to establish international institutions and mechanisms for global governance. Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, there have been ongoing debates about the creation of supranational bodies and the extent to which they should hold authority over nation-states. Bajer's skepticism towards a common supreme authority resonates with the complexities and challenges associated with the establishment of global governance structures.

In conclusion, Fredrik Bajer's quote reflects his critical stance on the idea of a common supreme authority and his broader commitment to principles of peace, autonomy, and decentralized governance. His perspective can be understood within the context of the historical and contemporary debates surrounding the balance of power, sovereignty, and international relations. Bajer's advocacy for a world order based on cooperation, mutual respect, and the preservation of national autonomy continues to resonate in discussions about global governance and the pursuit of peace.