Meaning: The quote by Jack Kingston, a prominent American politician, addresses the ongoing debate surrounding the definition of marriage and the concept of inclusivity within this institution. The quote reflects the broader societal discussion about the traditional understanding of marriage and the push for a more inclusive definition that encompasses a wider range of relationships.

In recent years, there has been a significant shift in public attitudes and legal frameworks regarding marriage. Historically, marriage has been defined as a union between a man and a woman. However, this traditional definition has been challenged as societies have become more diverse and inclusive of different sexual orientations and gender identities. As a result, there have been calls to expand the definition of marriage to encompass same-sex couples and other non-traditional relationships.

The quote suggests that if the definition of marriage is to be changed to be more inclusive, then it is logical to argue that the definition should be broadened further to ensure that it does not exclude anyone. This statement highlights the idea that inclusivity should be at the core of any redefinition of marriage. It implies that if society is willing to reconsider and expand the traditional boundaries of marriage, it should do so in a way that is fully inclusive of all individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation, gender identity, or relationship structure.

The quote can be interpreted as a call for a comprehensive reevaluation of the institution of marriage, not just in terms of legal recognition but also in terms of social acceptance and cultural norms. It suggests that any redefinition of marriage should be approached with the goal of creating a more inclusive and equitable institution that reflects the diversity of human relationships and experiences.

From a political standpoint, this quote reflects the ongoing debates and legislative efforts to redefine marriage laws to be more inclusive. The push for marriage equality has been a significant social and political movement in many countries, leading to changes in legislation and court rulings that recognize same-sex marriage and other non-traditional unions.

Jack Kingston's quote may also resonate with those who advocate for broader recognition of diverse family structures and relationships beyond the traditional nuclear family model. By highlighting the need to avoid excluding anyone in the redefinition of marriage, the quote aligns with the broader movement towards recognizing and valuing a wide range of relationships, including cohabiting partners, polyamorous families, and other non-traditional arrangements.

In conclusion, Jack Kingston's quote encapsulates the complex and evolving nature of the debate surrounding the definition of marriage and the pursuit of inclusivity within this institution. It underscores the importance of approaching any redefinition of marriage with a commitment to inclusivity and equity, reflecting the diverse range of relationships and identities in modern society. As the conversation around marriage continues to evolve, the quote serves as a reminder of the ongoing need to ensure that the institution of marriage is inclusive and reflective of the diverse realities of human relationships.