Meaning: The quote by Lincoln Kirstein is a thought-provoking reflection on the intersection of tradition and modernity, authority and freedom, and order and expression within the context of dance and, by extension, society at large. Kirstein, a prominent figure in the world of dance and co-founder of the New York City Ballet, offers a layered commentary on the evolving role of traditional dance forms in the contemporary landscape. Through his words, Kirstein invites us to consider the dynamic relationship between established conventions and the ever-changing nature of human expression.

Kirstein's assertion that "the traditional classic dance, compact of aristocratic authority and absolute freedom in a necessity of order, has never been so promising as an independent expression as it is today" encapsulates a complex set of ideas. At its core, the quote suggests that traditional forms of dance, which have historically been associated with aristocratic influence and stringent rules, are now uniquely positioned to assert their independence and relevance in a society marked by liberal democracy and pervasive anxiety. This observation implies that the tension between authority and freedom, characteristic of classic dance, can find new resonance and meaning in the contemporary world.

The phrase "liberal democracy and anxious anarchy" evokes the broader socio-political context in which Kirstein's commentary is situated. In liberal democracies, individual freedoms and rights are upheld, while "anxious anarchy" hints at a sense of disquiet and uncertainty that pervades modern society. By juxtaposing these contrasting concepts, Kirstein highlights the paradoxical nature of our times and sets the stage for a discussion of how traditional dance forms can navigate this complex terrain.

The notion of the classic dance being "compact of aristocratic authority and absolute freedom in a necessity of order" speaks to the intricate balance that traditional dance embodies. On one hand, it is rooted in a history of aristocratic patronage and formalized structures, signifying authority and tradition. On the other hand, it allows for a profound sense of freedom and expression within the confines of disciplined order. This duality, according to Kirstein, holds a particular promise in today's world, where the tension between established hierarchies and individual autonomy remains a pressing concern.

Kirstein's emphasis on the "independent expression" of traditional dance in contemporary society suggests a reclamation of its artistic agency and relevance. In an era marked by rapid cultural evolution and the democratization of artistic forms, the enduring power of classic dance to communicate, provoke, and inspire becomes especially compelling. By asserting the potential of traditional dance as an independent and meaningful mode of expression, Kirstein challenges us to look beyond its historical associations and appreciate its capacity to speak to and resonate with contemporary audiences.

In conclusion, Lincoln Kirstein's quote encapsulates a profound meditation on the enduring significance of traditional dance in the face of societal transformation. Through his nuanced exploration of authority, freedom, and order, Kirstein invites us to reconsider the role of classic dance as an independent and vital form of expression in the modern world. His words compel us to recognize the dynamic interplay between tradition and innovation, and to appreciate the timeless relevance of art in navigating the complexities of human existence.