Meaning: This quote by Edward Koch, a former mayor of New York City, is a witty and thought-provoking commentary on the accessibility and visibility of political dissent. Through this quote, Koch highlights the disparity in the ease and cost of expressing dissatisfaction with different levels of government. By humorously stating that it costs significantly less to picket against him compared to the President or Governor, he draws attention to the relative ease of criticizing local politicians and the potential impact of such actions.

Koch's quote reflects the idea that local politicians are often more accessible to their constituents compared to higher-ranking officials. In the United States, the President and Governors are figures of national and statewide significance, and their decision-making processes and actions can seem distant and removed from the everyday lives of individuals. As a result, expressing dissent or engaging in protest against these figures may require more effort, resources, and coordination, as symbolized by the higher costs associated with flying to Washington or Albany to picket.

On the other hand, local politicians, such as mayors, council members, or aldermen, are often perceived as more directly connected to their communities. They are more likely to interact with their constituents on a regular basis and may be more responsive to local concerns. As a result, the quote suggests that it is easier and less expensive to voice dissent against a local politician like Koch.

Furthermore, the quote also touches on the relative impact of protesting against different levels of government. By highlighting the minimal cost of picketing against himself, Koch implies that the impact of such dissent may be perceived as relatively inconsequential. This notion raises questions about the effectiveness of political activism and the extent to which different forms of protest can influence decision-making processes at various levels of government.

From a broader perspective, Koch's quote invites reflection on the nature of political engagement and the dynamics of power at different levels of government. It underscores the importance of understanding the accessibility and influence of different political offices and the ways in which individuals can participate in the democratic process.

In conclusion, Edward Koch's quote humorously captures the disparities in accessibility and impact of political dissent at different levels of government. It prompts us to consider the accessibility of local politicians, the dynamics of protest, and the potential influence of political engagement. While lighthearted in its delivery, the quote offers valuable insights into the nature of political participation and the relationships between citizens and their elected representatives.